You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Karzai PRT Disbandment Call Raises Concerns
2011-02-08
[Tolo News] Karzai's decision to disband Nato's provincial reconstruction teams has caused widespread concerns among experts and activists in Afghanistan.

Some Afghan activists described President Karzai's new suggestion about disbandment of Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRT) as premature and devastating.

At Munich Security Conference, President Hamid Maybe I'll join the Taliban Karzai emphasised on a need to dissolve all private security firms and said provincial reconstruction teams should end their missions in Afghanistan.

President Karzai described provincial reconstruction teams as immense challenge facing the Afghan government, the New York Times reported.

"I disagree with the idea and consider it a big loss to our provinces," Habibullah Kalimzai, an Afghan political analyst, told TOLOnews.

"Karzai's stances are not based on will of the people and Afghan institutions, but are more political," Haroun Mir, an Afghan political analyst, told TOLOnews.

According to New York Times Karzai has come up with the decision because donor countries directly support PRTs.

Admiral James Stavridis, Nato's Supreme Allied Commander for Europe, opposed Karzai's claim and said the teams pose no problems to the Afghan government.

Western countries have been doubtful about Karzai's potential to fight corruption in his government system, the New York Times said.

President Karzai's decision on PRTs is seen as clearly indicating that the presence of international community hugely threatens his authorities.
Posted by:Fred

#2  Actually, Bush's approach to Afghanistan was the correct one : do just what you need to and not a bit more, since it has always been and will always be a tribal hellhole. Iraq at least had a large middle class and a significant portion of the public was well-educated; Afghanistan is just the opposite. The only way to cleanup Afghanistan to kill half of the Pashtuns in Afghanistan and half of them in Pakistan, and make sure the non-Pashtuns rule Afghanistan - sort of like we had to do to the Apaches along the Mexican border. But there is no way in hell that we would be permitted to do that in the modern era, even if we had the political leadership with the balls to try it.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2011-02-08 18:57  

#1  Funny how even a creep like Karzai understands the Chicago Way, that those in charge of payoffs are the ones who set the rules.

I can only assume that W. Bush didn't want Afghanistan to stop being a failed state, as his reason for sustaining a piss poor form of government for them. It stands in stark contrast to what we did in Iraq.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-02-08 08:49  

00:00