You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
U.S. can't link Manning to Assange
2011-01-26
U.S. military officials tell NBC News that investigators have been unable to make any direct connection between a jailed army private suspected with leaking secret documents and Julian Assange, founder of the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks.
That's the bad news. The good news is, we can still execute him for espionage and treason.
The officials say that while investigators have determined that Manning had allegedly unlawfully downloaded tens of thousands of documents onto his own computer and passed them to an unauthorized person, there is apparently no evidence he passed the files directly to Assange, or had any direct contact with the controversial WikiLeaks figure.

U.S. Attorney General Eric holder has said his department is also considering whether it can prosecute the release of information under the Espionage Act.
He violated the various secrets acts. That ought to be enough, though I don't mind at all piling on just to send a message.
Assange told msnbc TV last month that WikiLeaks was unsure Army PFC Bradley Manning is the source for the classified documents appearing on his site. "That's not how our technology works, that's not how our organization works," Assange said. "I never heard of the name of Bradley Manning before it appeared in the media."

He called allegations that WikiLeaks had conspired with Manning "absolute nonsense."

On Monday, U.S. military officials also strongly denied allegations that Manning, being held in connection with the WikiLeaks' release of classified documents, has been "tortured" and held in "solitary confinement" without due process. The officials told NBC News, however, that a U.S. Marine commander did violate procedure when he placed Manning on "suicide watch" last week.
He violated procedure only if we wanted the little pisher to hang himself with his belt...
Military officials said Brig Commander James Averhart did not have the authority to place Manning on suicide watch for two days last week, and that only medical personnel are allowed to make that call.

The official said that after Manning had allegedly failed to follow orders from his Marine guards. Averhart declared Manning a "suicide risk." Manning was then placed on suicide watch, which meant he was confined to his cell, stripped of most of his clothing and deprived of his reading glasses -- anything that Manning could use to harm himself. At the urging of U.S. Army lawyers, Averhart lifted the suicide watch.

U.S. Marine and Army officials say Manning is being treated like any other maximum security prisoner at Quantico, Va. He is confined to his single-person cell 23-hours per day, permitted one hour to exercise, permitted reading material and given one hour per day to watch television.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  Mike a very good example! But I will replay my original thought I have had since this story broke: If you want to stop this type of behavior, execute private manning after a speedy and public trial. Let Assange leak the fact EVERY civilized nation thinks that North Korea should go away and the nobody wants a nuclear tipped Iran. We can survive those earth shattering revelations.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2011-01-26 20:41  

#4  *** cough *** cough **** ....D *** NGED DELICIOUS MCDONALD'S BREAKFAST BURRITO.

Prob because the USDOD is NOT trying to talk to the right People, or ask the right Question.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-01-26 19:45  

#3  In other news, the US Department of Justice can't find it's ass with both hands, mirror and a flashlight......
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2011-01-26 14:25  

#2  Smart enough to use a cutout middle? Great, go after the middle. Keep peeling the onion and prosecuting each layer.
Posted by: Speamble Wittlesbach8094   2011-01-26 14:13  

#1  Non-story, flled by a news office that is throwing anything it can at the wall and hoping it will stick. It's been known from the beginning (and little Brad at least manned up to this) that he passed the data to someone else, who in turn ran it to WikiLeaks. For them to say Assange had no direct contact with Manning is thoroughly and utterly disingenuous - he didn't NEED to have contact with him. That's like saying (at the risk of Godwinning this thread) that the US was unable to make any direct connection between the men who actually did the dirty work at Auschwitz and Hitler.

Mike

Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2011-01-26 12:44  

00:00