You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
How Soon Can N.Korea Develop Long-Range Missiles?
2011-01-13
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates claims that North Korea will be able to develop an inter-continental ballistic missile capable of reaching the U.S. mainland within five years. It is rare for a high-ranking U.S. government official to publicly present a time frame for such speculation.

A North Korean ICBM would have to have a maximum range of between 8,000-10,000 km to reach the continental U.S., and no ballistic missiles it has deployed so far have this range. Currently the Musudan mid-range ballistic missile, deployed in 2007, has the longest range of 3,000-4,000 km, making it capable of reaching the U.S. territory of Guam.

The Taepodong-2 missile, which is under development, is believed to achieve the longest range of an estimated 6,700 km. That would put Alaska within range but not the continental U.S. North Korea conducted two test launches of the missile, but both failed. In July 2006, a Taepodong-2 missile exploded in flight, while in another test launch in April 2009, in which the North claimed it put a satellite into orbit, the three-stage rocket crashed into the Pacific 3,200 km from its launch site.

But although the missile failed to separate and fell short of its target, it was the farthest range achieved by a North Korean missile under development. Some experts say the Taepodong-2 could attain a maximum range of more than 8,000 km if the weight of its warhead is reduced, but there appear to be many obstacles left.

Gates appears to have been prompted by several factors to make his claim. First of all, North Korea has not conducted any missile tests since 2009 but continues to work on long-range missiles by testing engines at its research and development facilities in Musudan-ri and Tongchang-ri. The second factor is North Korea's missile link with Iran. The two countries are believed to have exchanged nuclear and missile technology, and North Korean ICBMs may have been tested in Iran, according to U.S. and South Korean intelligence. North Korea could speed up the development of ICBMs through help from Iran.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  What annoys me is that they invariably call San Francisco the big target on the west coast, when it has little or no value. As far as China is concerned, they want Bremerton in Washington and San Diego neutralized, because that would cripple the US Pacific fleet.

Hopefully before they made a major play for Taiwan.

Believe it or not, there are no other suitable friendly deep water ports in the Pacific capable of the full range of aircraft carrier fleet services, repair, refuel and rearm. And by the time the Atlantic fleet could arrive, Taiwan would be over.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-01-13 13:27  

#3  This is one of those bad news, good news deals. The bad news being their ability to have a basic delivery capability and warhead. That would mean some big target in order to avoid a miss and do some damage, ie major city. The good news is that that left coast is first in range. /sarc off
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-01-13 11:58  

#2  Of course there is that low key incident when pieces of a Taepodong-2 warhead were believed to have been found in Alaska. In 2003, eight years ago.

Alleged by the Japanese based on US info, and published in an SKor newspaper.

According to the FAS, this is the definitive paper on the status of NKor missiles. (.pdf format)
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-01-13 09:54  

#1  IN A HEARTBEAT IFF CHINA WILL ALLOW IT. See MUSLIM NUC PAKISTAN + now also IRAN [LRBMS], etc. Third-Party States, espec ala so-called INTER-STATE "FRANCHISING".

Plus of course BLACK MARKET TRANSFERS.

Once again, NORTH KOREA > fears unilateral CHINESE TAKEOVER either directly via MAJOR NEW WAR, or indirectly by select NATURAL FORCES/FACTORS e.g. SINO-DPRK FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS in which most Analysts agree will disproportionately benefit China relative to North Korea.

In short, IMO NORTH KOREA cannot be seen by China as "TOO SUCCESSFUL" in any of its ADVANCED INDIGENOUS MIL, NUCLEAR TESTS. China holds the Korean Peninsula to be an ancient, STRATEGIC ROUTE OF FOREIGN INVASION AGZ CHINA, + has made it clear that anything on occurs on the Korean Peninsula is in its "STRATEGIC/CORE INTERESTS", ESPEC CHIN-SPECIFIC NATIONAL, GEOPOL + NUCLEAR SECURITY, + won't hesitate to militarily intervene on the Peninusla iff its same is threatened.

NORTH KOREA'S TESTS > may be PRE-PLANNED/INTENDED TO "FAIL", at least OVERTLY where relations wid overlord CHINA is concerned.

DPRK LABS + SECRET TEST FACILITIES, WHERE CHINA + WORLD MEDIAS HAVE LITTLE TO NO ACCESS, MAY BE A DIFFERENT ANIMAL ALTOGETHER???

In any case, DEMOCRATIC SOUTH KOREA + has a common interest wid Communist North Korea in preventing any Chinese takeover of North Korea, hence may "tolerate" a LIMITED NORTH KOREAN NUC ARSENAL, espec as complemented by SOUTH KOREA'S OWN NUCLEAR ARMS [+ Other].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2011-01-13 01:23  

00:00