You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
House Democrats Vote to Oppose Tax Cut Plan in Current Form
2010-12-09
House Democrats have voted to block President Obama's controversial tax cut plan from coming to the floor in its current form, a move one Democratic leadership aide said "shows how much the White House screwed this up."
Brilliant. The Democrats have screwed this epically. It reminds me of how John McCain torpedoed his campaign on a fateful day in September, 2008.

Look, Dhimmicrats: in less than one month you're going to be in the minority in the House. Remember those days? Don't worry, Eric Cantor will remind you. When January 3rd rolls around, you will have virtually no influence in the House. You won't set the agenda.

The Pubs will then pass their version of the tax bill. It will extend the 2002/3 tax cuts and won't include a single thing you want right now. Repeat that to yourselves: no estate tax. No extension of unemployment benefits. No sneaky-shit goodies slipped in at the last moment.

Obama is trying to help you get one last, long slurp at the trough, but you have to play ball with the man, and that means giving the Pubs some of what they want. They're the establishment Pubs, not the new-fangled Tea Party types who, when they get into the House, will do all sorts of strange things like read the bills and demand accountability. You think you're going to get your sneaky-shit done then? Dream on -- and that's dream, not D.R.E.A.M., which also isn't going anywhere in January.

If you insist on committing sepuku, however, at least allow us Tea Party Pubs to clean the knife afterwards. We're going to need it when we see you again in January.
Posted by:armyguy

#9  I've always seen socialism and Marxism as a form of feudalism, actually. You are chained to a country (piece of land) and so dependent on the government (lord) that you can never move and have to work that area for all generations.
Posted by: DarthVader   2010-12-09 21:49  

#8  > These thieves have been on the wrong side of every issue since slavery.

What do you think Marxism is? It's another form of slavery. It even emerged as Slavery was being abolished.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2010-12-09 18:23  

#7  Latest Gallup poll last week said nearly 40% of those surveyed still call themselves Democrats - when it's down to < 3.5%. I'll back off.

These thieves have been on the wrong side of every issue since slavery. Enuf.
Posted by: Hupeting Clunk3616   2010-12-09 15:45  

#6  "in 5 years, it'll be a fringe cult ala CPW (Communist Worker's Party)"

Mercutio, isn't that what the Dems are already (except for the fringe part - so far)?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2010-12-09 15:36  

#5  Does present a problem for GOP tho. Assuming an honest GOPer who believes retaining the tax cuts are critical, does s/he let them die rather than give into Dem wishlist - Amnesty, etc. etc. Or stand on principle and refuse, costing the country another few hundred thousand jobs? Dems probably think this is clever politics, but they've cut their own throats. Regardless of outcome, the Dem Party has made itself anathema. Many moderates, myself included, will be working to guarantee that in 5 years, it'll be a fringe cult ala CPW (Communist Worker's Party).
Posted by: Mercutio   2010-12-09 15:31  

#4  My guess is that they're trying to bluff for a better deal...armyguy has it right...tough to bluff when you're not holdin' trump and you're being dealt out for the next hand...or in this case the entire game next year
Posted by: Warthog   2010-12-09 14:45  

#3  Irrational ideological purity.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2010-12-09 14:30  

#2  What could possibly motivate this vote by them?

Now the Repubs can pass a standalone tax cut extension and get Obama to look like the bad guy when he vetoes it and the economy tanks further.

Now the Repubs, once poised to take the fire for not extending unemployment benefits, can honestly say it wasn't them who shot that extension down.

What, precisely, is the upside for the Dems to do what they did?
Posted by: no mo uro   2010-12-09 14:24  

#1  Sh*t---Meet Messkit.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2010-12-09 13:49  

00:00