You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Blair warns against deep-rooted radical Islam
2010-09-07
[Al Arabiya] Former British prime minister Tony Blair warned Sunday that the roots of radical Islam are far deeper than we think and said al-Qaeda would have killed 300,000 on Sept. 11, 2001 if they could.

"This is actually more like the phenomenon of revolutionary communism," Blair said in an interview with ABC News, commenting on the reach of Islamic extremism.

"It's the religious or cultural equivalent of it, and its roots are deep, its tentacles are long, and its narrative about Islam stretches far further than we think into even parts of mainstream opinion who abhor the extremism, but sort of buy some of the rhetoric that goes with it," he added.

Blair said he didn't understand fully the phenomenon at the time of 9/11, when al-Qaeda operatives hijacked planes and crashed two of them into the World Trade Center in New York, killing about 3,000 people.

"If these people could have killed 30,000 or 300,000, they would have," Blair warned.

The former British prime minister's remarks came just a week before the ninth anniversary of the attacks, which he said changed his outlook and led to perhaps the most controversial decision of his tenure -- his support for the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

Blair said he felt "an enormous responsibility" for the lives lost in the conflict, which was fiercely opposed by many in Britain.

But he said sanctions aimed at crippling Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein were "crumbling" and there were real fears that his regime could help terrorists acquire weapons of mass destruction.

"My view was in the circumstances after 9/11, you have to send such a strong signal out on this issue," he said.

The former leader took a similarly hard line on Iran, which many in the international community fear is seeking nuclear weapons under the guise of a civilian nuclear energy program.

"I would tell them they can't have it, and if necessary, they will be confronted with stronger sanctions and diplomacy. But if that fails, I'm not taking any option off the table," he said.

Blair said he did not favor war with Iran but added: "I'm saying I think you cannot exclude it because the primary objective has got to be to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon."
Posted by:Fred

#9  "If these people could have killed 30,000 or 300,000, they would have."

Three more "zeros" and you'll be there.
Posted by: gorb   2010-09-07 15:55  

#8  #6 Moderate muslims. "I can't hear you!" Hmmmmm.

I am beginning to think moderate Muslims are those that agree with terrorism and all the horrid things the Quran teaches, they just don't actively participate in terror. Kind of like Nazi's in Germany back in the 30's and 40's that didn't actively participate in genocide, but didn't stand against it either. It was okay with them.
Posted by: miscellaneous   2010-09-07 15:45  

#7  Blair is just getting this epiphany?

No, he, like Bush, got it from the very beginning. And like Bush, he was (and is) vilified for it.
Posted by: Glenmore   2010-09-07 13:05  

#6  Moderate muslims. "I can't hear you!" Hmmmmm.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-09-07 12:08  

#5  Â…and its narrative about Islam stretches far further than we think into even parts of mainstream opinion who abhor the extremism, but sort of buy some of the rhetoric that goes with it.

ItÂ’s questionable whether the Globalists buy into the extremist rhetoric. But what is clear is theyÂ’re willing to gamble with the Islamic threat if they see a response that is counter to their world order. The Bush/Blair pivot away from treating Jihadist Terrorism as a basic criminal function sent shock waves through the transnational elite. This crowd isnÂ’t anti-war as much as their progressive think tanks and NGOÂ’s would like you to think. That is, as long as the conflicts and methods of redress are of their choosing. However, the Bush doctrine was grounded in state sovereignty, which is antithetical to their vision of Global Governance. And therefore it continues to be countered with derision and active deceit.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2010-09-07 12:02  

#4  Blair is just getting this epiphany?
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-09-07 11:50  

#3  The elites aren't.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-09-07 09:18  

#2  "... its roots are deep, its tentacles are long, and its narrative about Islam stretches far further than we think into even parts of mainstream opinion who abhor the extremism, but sort of buy some of the rhetoric that goes with it," he added.

Its years and years after most of us have gotten it but years and years ahead of Obama and the left.
Posted by: lord garth   2010-09-07 06:09  

#1  RELATED > NEWSMAX > BLAIR describes ISLAMIC EXTREMISM as akin to the phenomenon [historic rise] of REVOLUTIONARY COMMUNISM.

As I've said or inferred times before on the Net, 1990's - PRESENT > RADICAL ISLAMISM = FAITH, GOD-BASED/CENTRIC SOCIALISTS + GOVTISTS;
+ 9-11 + WOT = WAR FOR OWG-NWO/GLOBAL GOVTISM includ COMMIE WORLD ORDER [CWO] + SOCIALIST-GOVTIST WORLD ORDER [SWO,GWO].

WAR FOR CONTROL OF THE WORLD........

Indirectly, Blair's comments also gives credence to the ISLAMIST/JIHADIST-LED LOCAL, REGIONAL INSURGENCIES as actually being a ISLAMIST-LED MUSLIM WORLD/GLOBAL CONQUEST, as in history the Commies tried to INTERNATIONALLY = GLOBALLY impose their brand of linear Socialism via both National Politics + by Violent or Military Force agz established Govts.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-09-07 03:05  

00:00