You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Saudi judge considers a spinal cord for a spinal cord
2010-08-20
A Saudi judge has asked several hospitals in the country whether they could damage a man's spinal cord as punishment after he was convicted of attacking another man with a cleaver and paralyzing him, local newspapers reported on Thursday.
Why not just crucify him?
The reports said Abdul-Aziz al-Mutairi, 22, was left paralyzed after a fight more than two years ago and asked a judge to impose an equivalent punishment on his attacker under Islamic law.
I'd guess getting severely damaged in a fight is one of the hazards of living in a violent society.
The newspaper Okaz said the judge in northwestern Tabuk province, identified as Saoud bin Suleiman al-Youssef, asked at least two hospitals for a medical opinion on whether surgeons could render the attacker's spinal cord nonfunctional. The attacker, who was not identified in the reports, has spent seven months in jail.
"First, do no harm" is a western concept. Proper Muslims have no problem with doing harm unless they can be taken to a Soddy court for it.
Posted by:Fred

#2  Oddly, it's not much different than a justice system Heinlein devised in one of his novels, called "balancing" - an eye for an eye kind of thing. On the other hand it also referred to "the night they killed all the lawyers" so it wasn't all bad.
Posted by: Mercutio   2010-08-20 14:21  

#1  What part of "barbaric legal system" was unclear?
Posted by: mojo   2010-08-20 13:35  

00:00