You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Dems Losing Wall Street Donations
2010-07-06
A revolt among big donors on Wall Street is hurting fundraising for the Democrats' two congressional campaign committees, with contributions from the world's financial capital down 65 percent from two years ago. The drop in support comes from many of the same bankers, hedge fund executives and financial services chief executives who are most upset about the financial regulatory reform bill that House Democrats passed last week with almost no Republican support. The Senate expects to take up the measure this month.

Almost half of that decline in large-dollar fundraising can be attributed to New York, according to a Washington Post analysis of records filed with the Federal Election Commission. Donors from that area have given $8.7 million this year, compared with $23.9 million at this point in the 2008 cycle, with most of those contributions coming from big contributors in the financial sector.

Reasons for the plummeting donations include concern about the economic recovery and the personalities of the President and the campaign committee leaders, Democratic experts say. But the overwhelming factor is the rising anger among financial executives who think they have not been treated well based on their support of Democrats over the past four years. Some retiring Democrats say pushing Wall Street reform is more important than any slippage in political donations.

"Democrats worked hard to pass reform with tough oversight, accountability and regulation, and it's no secret the big banks were against it," said Deirdre Murphy, spokeswoman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. "But we believe the appearance of preventing another financial collapse is the responsible thing to do, and at the end of the day, we will have the resources we need to compete in our targeted states, as will our candidates."
Posted by:Bobby

#4  Don't write off the Dems so easily.
Ditto. I do hear a lot of donks b*tching about BO. Whether or not they vote against him is another thing.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-07-06 23:00  

#3   Don't write off the Dems so easily.

Amen to that. I remember saying Clinton wouldn't serve a second term as well. Obama isn't the problem, he's only the symptom.
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-07-06 19:17  

#2  $2 trillion of taxpayer money not enough? The best quarters ever for Goldman-Sachs not good enough? Nothing is too good for our Pig Men. Taxpayers won't forget? I don't know if they ever really knew what happened. Then there are all those voters who are not taxpayers, plus those who don't have half a brain. Don't write off the Dems so easily.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2010-07-06 10:58  

#1  But the overwhelming factor is the rising anger among financial executives who think they have not been treated well based on their support of Democrats over the past four years.

$2 trillion of taxpayer money not enough? The best quarters ever for Goldman-Sachs not good enough?

Investment banks and speculators bought Obama and the Dems. They broke the economy. Now you own them and the taxpayers won't forget.
Posted by: ed   2010-07-06 08:21  

00:00