| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| " |
| 2010-06-22 |
| Jim Geraghty, National Review's "Morning Jolt" Oh, J. D. Hayworth. What are we going to do with you? Phil Klein: “I understand why many Arizona Republicans would want to dump John McCain for a more conservative Senator, but I've never understood those who argue that J. D. Hayworth is the conservative who should replace McCain. Hayworth, after all, was a top recipent of donations linked to corrupt lobbyist Jack Abramoff, and was a reliable vote for President Bush's big government agenda. The weakness of Hayworth's claim to be a small government conservative was brought into sharper focus with the release of this 2007 infomercial that Hayworth recorded for the National Grants Conference, which offers seminars on how to people can get free money from government through grants.'... The Arizona Republic quotes a Hayworth spokesman as saying he only did one commercial, but I think one misstep is all it takes to do the damage. Put aside the claims that these seminars are a scam, charging folks $999 to $1,200 for publicly available information and greatly exaggerating the availability of the federal grants. The Hayworth campaign tells NRO the former congressman has no regrets. Really, J. D.? Really? Not one iota of contemplation that maybe a former United States congressman should not be appearing in ads telling people that the federal government is just full of money and that they should be asking for more of it, at least not if he ever plan on running for office again on a platform of controlling spending and fiscal conservatism?!? Beyond that, the ad is so tacky it makes those “Real Housewives' series look classy. You're a U.S. congressman, you're supposed to be above these sorts of things. After you leave Congress, you're supposed to make your money the old-fashioned, honest way: writing a book no one will read, teaching a class that is only for the most diehard of political geeks, trading on your connections with a fat-cat, Gucci-wearing lobbying firm, and in the case of former Ohio congressman Jim Traficant, making license plates. If we have congressman popping up in infomercials, next thing you know we'll have the President of the United States appearing in commercials for late-night shows. |
| Posted by:Mike |
| #4 Whatever his flaws, John McCain would be vastly preferable to the bucket of rotting crayfish in the Oval Office now. This is where I generally chime in about RINOs damaging the brand to the point where people will elect just about any idiot. But that has already happened. Still, deep in my bones I can't accept that McCain would have been better. We'd still be getting cap & trade and amnesty for illegals--but it would be a putative Republican doing it! Ouch. And I think that when it's all over Obama will have set the stage for a real conservative to become President just as Carter set the stage for Reagan. McCain would not have done that, obviously. |
| Posted by: Iblis 2010-06-22 20:15 |
| #3 Are there no limits to the slander on Rantburg? On behalf of "buckets of rotting crayfish" everywhere, I would like to lodge a formal complaint regarding the aforementioned comparisons. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2010-06-22 18:19 |
| #2 I think it was succinctly put by an Arizonan that he would rather vote for a bucket of rotting crayfish than John McCain. Whatever his flaws, John McCain would be vastly preferable to the bucket of rotting crayfish in the Oval Office now. |
| Posted by: Mike 2010-06-22 18:08 |
| #1 I think it was succinctly put by an Arizonan that he would rather vote for a bucket of rotting crayfish than John McCain. J.D. Hayworth can be criticized for many things, but the Democrats both hate and fear him, which speaks highly of his character. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2010-06-22 13:11 |