| Submit your comments on this article |
| Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
| Phoenician or Arab? Lebanon non-ending debate |
| 2010-06-08 |
| [Al Arabiya Latest] "I am a Phoenician, not an Arab," asserts 20-year-old Lebanese student Rebecca Yazbeck when asked to define her identity, with nothing more than conviction to back her claim. But fellow Lebanese Shehade Seqlawi feels differently. "There is no question that we are Arabs," says the 50-year-old chauffeur. "We live in an Arab environment." A debate over national identity has raged in Lebanon since the start of the 20th century with many Maronites, the dominant Christian sect in the multi-confessional country, claiming direct ancestry from the Phoenicians in a bid to stand apart in the largely Muslim Middle East. The Phoenicians were an intrepid seafaring people and tradesmen largely credited with creating the first widely used alphabet. With the onset of the civil war in 1975, the debate over identity became more acute as the term Phoenician started being bandied about as an ideological weapon and a means to differentiate Christians from Muslims. But various scientific studies in recent years have served to debunk the idea that Phoenician ancestry is related in any way to religion or a specific nationality. "You can be Muslim or Christian and carry a Phoenician signature," said Pierre Zalloua, a Lebanese scientist who has carried out research to trace the genetic origin of Middle Eastern peoples. He notes that populations across the eastern Mediterranean coastline -- Syria, Lebanon and the Palestinian territories -- share much of the same genetic makeup. "The Phoenicians lived before monotheistic religions and geopolitical divisions," said Zalloua, whose research has been published in the American Journal of Human Genetics and Annals of Human Genetics. At least 30 percent of Lebanese, regardless of religion, have a genetic "stamp" that bears the mark of the Phoenicians, he told AFP. "It was very surprising to find that after thousands of years there are still so many traces of Phoenician genes," added Zalloua, who collects DNA samples to trace genealogy. "This shows that we are all not so different from each other." But no science will convince some Lebanese, like Yazbeck, that they are anything other than Phoenician. "Of course I am first and foremost of Phoenician origin," insists the green-eyed blonde. "I don't think the Lebanese are Arabs," she adds. "Civilizations have evolved, but we have been here for centuries." An article in the Lebanese constitution drafted in 1943 stipulated that Lebanon was a country with an "Arab face." This was replaced at the end of the civil war in 1990 with an article labeling it "an Arab country." The ancient Phoenicians traversed the seas as early as 1200 BC, passing through what are today Lebanon, Spain and Morocco via Cyprus and Carthage, a thriving city which they founded in modern-day Tunisia. The Lebanese port city of Tyre was the main city-state in Phoenicia, which covered roughly the same area as modern-day Lebanon. Among the other main centers of the civilization were Byblos, Sidon and what is now known as Beirut. Historian Boutros Labaki argues that while the Lebanese today agree on the fact they are Lebanese, they differ as to whether they share a common identity. "The decades-old debate over how you define yourself as a Lebanese persists," he told AFP. "In order to promote its own political project, each community has sought to legitimize itself by forging an identity to mobilize its supporters." This means that while Yazbeck and Seqlawi agree they are both Lebanese, they differ as to their origin, giving rise to wry comments and bemusement among Arab states and other countries. Even Syrian President Bashar al-Assad quipped in an interview recently that he was surprised that some Lebanese still refer to themselves as Phoenicians. For Marianne, a friend of Yazbeck who refused to give her last name, there is no two ways about it. "We can't deny our Arab identity," said the 22-year-old. "But we're not really Arabs. "We're more open than others." |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #9 Phubars. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2010-06-08 21:21 |
| #8 What language do you speak? "Arab" is a linguistic group, not an ethnic group. It's made up of people whose "first language" is Arabic. |
| Posted by: mojo 2010-06-08 16:39 |
| #7 Egypt has a long pre-Islamic history yet most of them consider themselves Arab by this point. On the other hand... Arabs and Sephartic Jews are both Semites so there is a case to be made that ethincally identical but cultural or religious differences can justify a new name. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2010-06-08 12:04 |
| #6 While I was in Lebanon (69-73) I heard plenty of debates about that. Christians had the tendency to side with Phoenicians and Muslims with Arabs. The Tanakh would be a good source for pre-muslims' era. And by the way what is the definition of "Arab"? Is it a race, a religion, a country, what? Or just a language. O |
| Posted by: Willy 2010-06-08 11:03 |
| #5 To me they're all vermin. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2010-06-08 10:25 |
| #4 one of my best buddies growing up was Lebanese - his family all claimed to be Phoenician in ancestry, not Arab. This is interesting. |
| Posted by: Broadhead6 2010-06-08 10:20 |
| #3 The Phoenicians are mentioned in the Bible as very early Seafarers with ancient archaological inscriptions claiming to be Phoenician found near Paramaribo, Suriname. Hiram of Tyre was Solomon's master builder and shipmaker for trade around the world, aiding in constructing Israel in the glory days. The expansionist Arabs, from the Arabian peninsula of modern Saudi and Yemen, were identified as enemies of the Jews biblically when they disrupted the rebuilding of the wall in Nehemiah's time following Babylonian exile. Claiming territory not their own is ancient news and there is still friction about the bossy outsiders taking over in Afghanistan, Iran, and Iraq. |
| Posted by: Lumpy Elmoluck5091 2010-06-08 10:03 |
| #2 Well they can be Phoenicians just as Palestinian were created out of nowhere a couple of decades ago to describe the Arabs in the Palestine region. The real play here is shame in Arab-ness vs pride in Arab-ness. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2010-06-08 09:46 |
| #1 No bibliography cites? What's next, the AP lifting news from bloggers? Oh, wait, never mind. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2010-06-08 08:37 |