| Submit your comments on this article |
| Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
| Striking Iran last option: US military chief |
| 2010-04-20 |
| [Al Arabiya Latest] United States President Barack Obama's national security advisers are considering a broad range of options to curb Iran's nuclear program, among them military strikes, if diplomacy and sanctions fail, Pentagon officials said early Monday. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, releasing a statement on Sunday about a secret memorandum he sent to the White House in January, said he identified "next steps in our defense planning process" that would be reviewed by decision makers in the coming weeks and months. "There should be no confusion by our allies and adversaries that the United States is properly and energetically focused on this question and prepared to act across a broad range of contingencies in support of our interests," Gates said in the statement, issued to refute characterizations of the memo in a New York Times report. Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, said early Monday the military options available to Obama would go "a long way" to delaying Iran's nuclear progress but may not set the country back long-term. He called a military strike his "last option" right now. The comments underscored the difficult choices facing Obama in trying to keep Iran from getting a nuclear bomb without setting off a broader conflict. "It's very hard to predict outcomes there," Mullen told reporters after addressing a forum at Columbia University in New York. Mullen said there was "not much decision space to work in because of both outcomes -- having a weapon and striking generate unintended consequences that are difficult to predict." "I think Iran having a nuclear weapon would be incredibly destabilizing. I think attacking them would also create the same kind of outcome," he added. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #6 I wouldn't invade. Just bomb the crap out of their government while it is session and let the citizens fix things. |
| Posted by: gorb 2010-04-20 14:20 |
| #5 How about they lose an oil refinery every day until they come round with the cooperation. They'd understand that. |
| Posted by: bigjim-CA 2010-04-20 14:10 |
| #4 Geez, I'd think that a naval war, full-scale invasion, and saturation nuclear bombing would be the third, second-to-last, and last options, respectively, but that's why they hand out the big gongs to flag-grade officers, I guess. |
| Posted by: Mitch H. 2010-04-20 10:16 |
| #3 Last, as in after they already have half a dozen nukes distributed to terrorists? |
| Posted by: gorb 2010-04-20 09:47 |
| #2 "It's very hard to predict outcomes there," Mullen told reporters after addressing a forum at Columbia University in New York. Difficult possibly for you Admiral. Let me help you. Your boss will do absolutely NOTHING! |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2010-04-20 03:59 |
| #1 There, fixed that. |
| Posted by: crosspatch 2010-04-20 01:41 |