| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| Destroying America, One Environmental Law at a Time |
| 2010-04-20 |
| While America maintains the greatest military power in the history of mankind, fearful of another terrorist attack on its soil, it is being destroyed from within by the relentless imposition of laws that defy science and common sense. Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) has introduced legislation to "reform" the 34-year-old Toxic Substances Control Act. Americans are hearing a lot about "reform" these days, having just had a healthcare "reform" imposed against the wishes of the vast majority. This bill has the support of the White House, environmentalists, and a suicidal chemical industry. The chemical industry, like all others in the nation these days, is so fearful of the power of the federal government that it will agree to its own destruction. Thus, Cal Dooley, president of the American Chemistry Council, babbles about being "constructively engaged" in furthering the reform. Reportedly, DuPont, another chemistry giant, called the bill "a good starting point." The poison is in the dose. It is one of the most ancient truths of science. It is the amount of a given chemical that determines its toxicity. We all take chemicals daily without any thought to this. Too much aspirin can be harmful. Too much of any of the vitamins, minerals, and herbal treatments can be harmful. Too much food can be harmful! Everything has a level at which it becomes toxic. The proposed legislation would mandate that manufacturers submit health and safety data to the Environmental Protection Agency for 84,000 chemicals in use. The EPA has never met a chemical it has not wanted to ban, particularly if it has a use that is beneficial to human life. This law has no purpose beyond expanding the authority and power of the EPA, an agency which is currently threatening to regulate carbon dioxide, one of the two gases along with oxygen on which all life on Earth depends! If you think American companies do not conduct extensive testing of everything they manufacture, you do not know about the huge liability they face if they do not. By way of just one example, pesticide producers spend between $100 and $300 million to test a single new compound before it can be approved and made available either to pest management professionals or consumers. The federal government has massive bureaucracies devoted to safety in all aspects of our lives. In addition to the EPA, there's the Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, the National Highway Safety Administration, the National Transportation Safety Board, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission...to name just a few! Environmentalists, and the "precautionary principle" Dr. Elizabeth Whelan, president of the American Council on Science and Health, addressing the proposed law, said, "It is impossible to prove that something is safe. You cannot scientifically prove a negative. Even water can be dangerous. They say this bill would make it easier for the EPA to ban chemicals that are known hazards. Hazards to whom? Laboratory rats?" If you feed a laboratory rat enough of anything, it will become ill and even die. The environmentalists, however, subscribe to the "precautionary principle", an idiotic belief that IF anything is believe to pose a threat to health, it must be banned from use. This is the guiding principle of the EPA. Americans now have the longest life expectancy in the history of the nation. They live a lot longer than laboratory rats. They even recover from life-threatening disease through the use of drugs--medication--and other procedures. If the EPA gets the power to ban 84,000 chemicals currently in use for a million different legitimate purposes and products, life expectancy will drop like a stone in water. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #11 Yes. |
| Posted by: Asymmetrical 2010-04-20 20:54 |
| #10 Look at California and what Draconian-minded environmentalist have done to the state. It is not fit for people to live there. I lived and worked there in the early 1960s (much younger). The place was booming, lots of jobs, lots of work, lots of opportunity, lots of industry. The state was fairly conservative at the time with the exception of Berkeley and San Francisco area. It was not considered the "left coast." |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2010-04-20 16:52 |
| #9 .at least we don't have a 55.5 M concentration of some nucleophilic compound in our lakes, that could be reactive you know. *giggle* You don't play fair, Chemist! I nearly fell off my chair. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2010-04-20 13:03 |
| #8 The scourge of dihydrogen monoxide must be stopped. For the children... |
| Posted by: tu3031 2010-04-20 12:18 |
| #7 Cut them all down, spray the area with pesticides and pave it. |
| Posted by: 746 2010-04-20 12:09 |
| #6 I think Bobby hit the nail on the head. "Mo green means....Mo GREEN ($$$)!" Bobby Sinclair |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2010-04-20 11:52 |
| #5 ...with about 8,000 deaths related to skin cancer, I suspect the next EPA decree will ban exposure to sun light. See right there under the EPA Morlock Regulation of 2011. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2010-04-20 11:42 |
| #4 I'm sick of the Environazis at the EPA trying to control our behaviors and gut America from the inside out. What's next? Laws mandating rain to fall uphill? |
| Posted by: Mike Hunt 2010-04-20 11:08 |
| #3 Why is everyone so concerned about dihydrogen monoxide? Its the hydroxic acid (H-OH) that worries me, acid is bad you know....don't even get me started on the hydrogen hydroxide...at least we don't have a 55.5 M concentration of some nucleophilic compound in our lakes, that could be reactive you know. |
| Posted by: Chemist 2010-04-20 11:01 |
| #2 Well, yeah, in a perfect world. /sarc off |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2010-04-20 08:42 |
| #1 Di-hydrogen monoxide kills more people every year than any other chemical. The EPA should ban it. |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2010-04-20 07:29 |