You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
So Much For Blue Dog Democrats
2010-03-23
Bart Stupak's surrender on ObamaCare likely signals the end of pro-life Democrats, as several commentators have noted.

But Sunday's votes also may mark the end of Democrats' revival in the South and Midwest. The party made a concerted effort in 2006 and 2008 to recruit candidates that could win moderate or GOP-leaning districts. That's a key reason why Democrats won such big congressional majorities.

But after forging a big-tent caucus, Speaker Pelosi has not governed that way. Instead, she pushed Blue Dog and other moderate Democrats to vote as if they represented her San Francisco district.

The GOP already is targeting five Democrats who voted no on the House health bill in November but flipped to yes on the overhaul on Sunday: Ohio's John Boccieri, Florida's Allen Boyd, Colorado's Betsy Markey, Florida's Susanne Kosmas and New York's Scott Murphy. John McCain carried the first four districts in 2008 while Murphy only won 50% of the vote that year. Boyd, Markey and Murphy are all part of the Blue Dog coalition.

These five members may be especially at-risk, but in this year, even Democrats that voted no on all of Obama's big agenda items may be vulnerable.

Pelosi and other House leaders largely represent ultrasafe seats, so they don't have to worry about voter backlash. Nor do liberal pundits, who heaped scorn on moderates for not jumping joyfully at the chance to commit political suicide.

Pelosi, Obama and the NYC-D.C. liberal blogosphere have talked themselves into believing their own press releases. They think that voting for ObamaCare will not hurt dozens of Democratic members across the country in November, the polls and recent history be damned. They care little about the people those moderate Democrats represent.

Remember when these folks called themselves the "reality-based community"?

Such hubris has its price. It will be a long, long time before voters in battleground districts and states trust Democratic candidates. And why would quality centrists run when national leaders are going to treat them like shock troops?

Posted by:Fred

#5  I wouldn't bother much with going off on Kosmas and her supposed "blue dog" pedigree or her theoretical "pro-life" position. Trust me, no one cares about that crap in her home district.

Hammer that cow with her vote on this health care monstrosity....AND the fact that she was worthless in saving thousands of jobs at NASA even though she's on the damn subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics. (BTW, unemployment there on the Space Coast is already over 10%. Losing these jobs, many of them with good pay and bennies, is not something you would want on your watch.)
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2010-03-23 16:30  

#4  Its simple: they lied. Vote them out.
Posted by: Beldar Threreling9726   2010-03-23 11:07  

#3  Don't conflate pro-life Dems with Blue Dog Dems.

My Blue Dog voted no!
Posted by: Parabellum   2010-03-23 08:19  

#2  Nothing new here except a further validation. The germ "pro-life Democrat" has always been an oxymoron.
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-03-23 05:41  

#1  I was surprised when Lipinski (IL-3) stuck to his beliefs, and darned pleased too! Good on ya Dan!
Posted by: Waldemar Gleamp1150   2010-03-23 00:45  

00:00