You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Rules Committee meeting descends into chaos (re. Deem & Pass)
2010-03-21
RTWT before commenting. Both updates are important.
At the House Rules Committee meeting, Democrats desperate to pass their national health care plan are running into the barrier of basic civics. Here is the problem: The Senate has passed its HCR bill. If the House passes the same bill, it goes on to the president; once he signs it, the bill becomes law. But House Democrats, when they vote for the Senate bill using the "Deem & Pass" dodge, also want to simultaneously pass a package of amendments to the law. Except HCR will not, at that point, be law. It will only become law when the president signs it. Congress can amend the law -- it does so all the time -- but can it amend something that isn't law?

Which is where Democrats are tripping up. Passage of their HCR proposal should be very simple: Senate passes it, House passes it, president signs it. But House Democrats are terrified of voting for the unpopular bill, so they hope to pass it by "Deem & Pass," in which they will vote, not for the bill, but for a rule that both deems the Senate bill to have passed and, in the same vote, passes the package of amendments. So House Democrats will have two fig leaves: 1) they didn't vote directly for the Senate bill, and 2) they voted to simultaneously amend -- to "fix" -- the Senate bill.
Posted by:gorb

#3  Disbar any attorney that helped set this farce up.
Posted by: newc   2010-03-21 05:37  

#2  Our founding fathers probably never even considered this idea because it doesn't make sense. Otherwise, they would have enacted the Bill of Rights before they ratified the Constitution in order to quell concerns, not after.

I wonder what the Constitution would look like if they knew then how people would behave today.

It's gone from "What does the Constitution let us do" to "Well, it doesn't say we can't do that!" And if that is a problem, they redefine the meaning of "regulate" or whatever word is being inconvenient.
Posted by: gorb   2010-03-21 02:49  

#1  only in DC... real world common sense has no place there... a bizzaro world where you can with a straight face amend a law that has not passed. (and other even wackier things)

:(
Posted by: abu do you love   2010-03-21 02:12  

00:00