| Submit your comments on this article | ||||||
| Britain | ||||||
| More Allegations About UK's Labour Government Mass Immigration Policies | ||||||
| 2010-02-10 | ||||||
| The Government has been accused of pursuing a secret policy of encouraging mass immigration for its own political ends. The release of a previously unseen document suggested that Labour's migration policy over the past decade had been aimed not just at meeting the country's economic needs, but also the Government's "social objectives". The paper said migration would "enhance economic growth" and made clear that trying to halt or reverse it could be "economically damaging". But it also stated that immigration had general "benefits" and that a new policy framework was needed to "maximise" the contribution of migration to the Government's wider social aims. More evidence (if it were needed) that left-wing politics represents cultural suicide. The Government has always lied through its teeth/ denied that social engineering played a part in its migration policy. However, the paper, which was written in 2000 at a time when immigration began to increase dramatically, said controls were contrary to its policy objectives and could lead to "social exclusion".
Voting trends indicate that migrants and their descendants are much more likely to vote Labour. The existence of the draft policy paper, which was drawn up by a Cabinet Office think tank and a Home Office research unit, was disclosed last year by Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett. He alleged at the time that the sharp increase in immigration over the past 10 years was partly due to a "driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multi-cultural". However, the full document was made public only yesterday following a Freedom of Information request by Migrationwatch, a pressure group. A version of the paper was published in 2001, but most of the references to "social objectives" had been removed. In the executive summary alone, six out of eight uses of the phrase were deleted. Labour has overseen an unprecedented rise in immigration, which has led to a rise of about three million in the UK population since 1997. Until recently, it accused opponents who called for tougher controls of playing the "race card".
Gordon Brown pledged to secure "British jobs for British workers" as the recession led to a rise in unemployment and, just four months ago, he was accused of a U-turn when he insisted that it was "not racist" to discuss the issue. There is no level of contempt that Brown is unworthy of. The document released yesterday suggested that Labour originally pursued a different direction. It was published under the title "Migration: an economic and social analysis" but the removal of significant extracts suggested that officials or ministers were nervous over references to "social objectives". The original paper called for the need of a new framework for thinking about migration policy but the concluding phrase -- "if we are to maximise the contribution of migration to the Government's economic and social objectives" -- was edited out. Another deleted phrase suggested that it was "correct that the Government has both economic and social objectives for migration policy". Sir Andrew Green, the chairman of Migrationwatch, said the document showed that Mr Neather, who claimed ministers wanted to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", had been correct in his account of Labour's immigration policy. "Labour had a political agenda which they sought to conceal for initiating mass immigration to Britain," he said. "Why else would they be so anxious to remove any mention of social aspects? Only now that their working-class supporters are deserting them in droves have they started to talk about restricting immigration." Damian Green, the shadow immigration minister, accused the Government of having a secret policy. "This shows that Labour's open-door immigration policy was deliberate, and ministers should apologise," he said. "This makes it all the more important that there is a proper independent inquiry in the origins of this policy and whether ministers have been deceiving people." Jack Straw, who was home secretary when the paper was drawn up, has adamantly denied any secret plot and insisted that he had been tough on immigration.
| ||||||
| Posted by:Bulldog |
| #3 Political power comes from the eye slit of a burka |
| Posted by: Mullah Lodabullah 2010-02-10 08:47 |
| #2 Alan Johnson, the Home Secretary, will announce today moves to make it harder to earn citizenship. Just throw the illegals out , we know who they are and how little they contribute , then tighten immigration for just Highly Skilled Migrant Programme. Makes sure they stay for 6-10 years and pay back what we have given , i.e. a superior education in medicine , engineering or whatever than what they would get the sh1thole they came from. Oooh wait , labour want the votes to keep their skanky slimey selves in power.. corrupt socialism at its best . Well done Labour , in doing what Communsim , Fascism , and terrorism have tried to do over the years , but failed. Shot in the foot by the Government voted in by a dumb average jo citizen. Irony. |
| Posted by: Oscar 2010-02-10 04:37 |
#1 Sorry Mods - I put this in the wrong category - should be 'Britain' and 'Seedy Politicians', I think.
| |
| Posted by: Bulldog 2010-02-10 03:15 |