You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Oregon Says Yes to Taxing Wealthy, Businesses
2010-01-27
PORTLAND, Ore. -- Oregon has set aside its history of shooting down tax increases on statewide ballots, with voters endorsing higher taxes on businesses and the rich amid a brutal economic slump.

Democrats in the Oregon Legislature made it as easy as they could for the voters to raise taxes on somebody else, and the electorate responded Tuesday by approving Measures 66 and 67.

The increases approved Tuesday will hit people with taxable income upward of $125,000 -- estimated at fewer than 3 percent of filers. Many businesses who had been paying an annual $10 minimum will see that rise to at least $150.

With 91 percent of the vote counted, the vote was 54-46 on Measure 66 and 53-47 on Measure 67.

Oregon voters have consistently rebuffed legislative attempts to take more in tax revenue -- such as a cigarette tax to pay for health insurance for children three years ago, two previous income tax measures that would have hit most Oregonians and nine sales tax measures over the decades.

A Democratic legislative leader, Senate President Peter Courtney, said he was, just in case, preparing a statement acknowledging defeat just before the results were reported Tuesday.

"This is a tax vote?" he exclaimed later when the victory was evident. "This is indescribable ... It's Oregon being Oregon."

The vote affirms the two-year budget the Legislature controlled by Democrats adopted last year, and spares it $727 million worth of budget cutting during a four-week session that begins Monday.

Courtney's counterpart in the House, Speaker Dave Hunt, says the session will focus on legislation to spur job creation and to help people hurt by the slump that has boosted the unemployment rate to 11 percent and driven record numbers of people to seek aid such as food stamps.

Oregon's Sherwood Forest, take-from-the-rich strategy might appeal to legislators in other states struggling to bandage their budgets, said Portland pollster Tim Hibbitts.

"The nature of the measure they crafted was very smart political strategy," he said.

"If you're going to take this to a red state, it's going to be a lot more difficult," he said. "Other blue states that are feeling the pressure may say, 'Maybe we could craft a similar measure and win with that."'
Can California be far behind?
Business leaders and Republicans were glum. Hibbitts' polls suggested a closer vote, and for much of the voting period, liberal Multnomah County was slow to mail in and drop off ballots, raising the hopes of the tax opponents.

It was a victory for public employee unions who were the spearhead of the campaign for the taxes and raised enough money to outspend the opponents.
Does anyone smell SEIU tang.
A Common Cause analysis put their fundraising advantage to date at $6.85 million to $4.55 million in one of the state's most expensive campaigns.

"The bottom line is the unions bought the election," said State Republican Chairman Bob Tiernan. "It's going to be a sadder day as more businesses leave the state and more don't want to come here."
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#6  Early reports indicate that one day after this vote, layoffs are happening and businesses are already making plans to move out of state.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2010-01-27 23:52  

#5  Austin / Dallas Chamber of Commerce - white courtesy phone please.
Posted by: DMFD   2010-01-27 19:32  

#4  Liberal Dems in Oregon would not cut spending (Public Employees Unions) and did not have the guts to raise taxes (Not my yob) so they got the masses to do it for them. Slick!
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2010-01-27 15:12  

#3  Oregon has a lot of contractual obligations to pay for things that, with the collapse of the construction & thus logging industries they no longer have anything close to the necessary tax revenues to do. So they have to raise taxes on those they can. So some of those retire, or close their small business, or move elsewhere, which leaves another revenue shortfall. So they will have to raise taxes again, and so on and so on. California is seeing the same thing. The entire nation is starting to. It's an economic death spiral.
Posted by: Glenmore   2010-01-27 14:16  

#2  It's a good thing there is plenty of room in Nevada.
Posted by: Kelly   2010-01-27 13:07  

#1  In other news, snake sees own tail as tasty snack.
Posted by: Bulldog   2010-01-27 12:57  

00:00