You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Schumer calls for hearings on 'un-American' court decision
2010-01-21
The Supreme Court's ruling Thursday striking down limits on corporate and union spending in elections is "un-American," Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Thursday. Schumer, a top Senate Democrat who formerly ran their campaign committee, said he would hold hearings on the decision in the coming weeks.
You going to try and drag Supreme Court justices in front of your committee? I'll stock up on popcorn, this should be fun.
"I think it's an un-American decision," Schumer said at a press conference Thursday. "I think when the American people understand what this radical decision has meant they will be even more furious and concerned about special interest influence in politics than they are today."

Democrats have responded quickly to rebuke the court's 5-4 ruling in the Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission case, handed down Wednesday. The decision essentially kills a sizable portion of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, better known as the McCain-Feingold Act for its high-profile sponsors. The law, until this ruling, had subject corporations to special spending limits and disclosure rules that did not apply to individuals.

Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.), the sponsor of that 2002 law, has called for new legislation to address the court's ruling. Schumer said Thursday he'd hold hearings as chairman of the Senate Rules Committee. "As chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, which is the committee with jurisdiction over these issues, I'm announcing that we will hold hearings on the impact of this decision within the next of couple of weeks," Schumer said.

At least one Republican -- Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell -- praised that ruling on Wednesday. He described the court's decision as guarantee of "free speech" to businesses groups that were previously deprived of it.

But a handful of Democrats have since charged otherwise. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairman Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) said earlier Wednesday that new corporate spending abilities would only ensure "citizens voices are drowned out."
Yeah, who do those corporate fatcats we blackmail for cash think they are!
Schumer echoed those criticisms in his press conference Wednesday morning, describing the ruling as a grave mistake. "We will regret the day this decision has been issued," Schumer said.
Posted by:Beavis

#5  Agree Glemmore - also disallow the kind of credit-card contribution which is not security checked like Obama did last time - that is a open invitation to corruption. Who know how much foreign money was channeled to him.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2010-01-21 22:35  

#4  If Chuck Schumer says it's bad, then it must be GOOD!
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-01-21 21:27  

#3  ALL contributions should be allowed.
ALL contributions should be reported instantly, accurately, and in a public forum (and not in some street name either.) Name, employer, amount.
Posted by: Glenmore   2010-01-21 20:21  

#2  There should be NO campaign contributions once you get past primaries. It shouldn't be about who has the most money.
Posted by: AllahHateMe   2010-01-21 15:58  

#1  McCain/Feingold had a lot to do with the attempt to shut out and shut up the NRA. McCain was doing his "I'm a bipartisan (send me money)" schtick like the worthless toad he is.

This is a victory for free speech, no wonder the Dems are scared s***less. The more free speech there is the less they can do.
Posted by: AlanC   2010-01-21 15:08  

00:00