You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Lessons from John Galt
2009-12-29
Recent headlines seem lifted directly out of an Ayn Rand novel. President Obama decries the "fat cat bankers on Wall Street". Harry Reid attacks insurance companies for making too much profit. House Democrat leaders call Tea Partiers "Racist, Nazi, Gun Nuts". How about this nauseating statement made by Army General George Casey after the Muslim terrorist attack on Ft. Hood?
As great a tragedy as this was, it would be a shame if our diversity became a casualty as well
Each of these headlines might well have been uttered by an Ayn Rand character. Rand, whose father's pharmacy was confiscated by the Soviets during the communist revolution of 1917, and who came to America in 1926, seems uniquely able to speak to us about the inverted morality of our times. Virtue is to be apologized for. Depravity commands respect. Success is cast as evil and punished while failure is blamed on others and rewarded. Rand's insights into the psychological state of collectivists--those who demand that we sacrifice our individual freedom and happiness for the sake of the state--explain what often seems incomprehensible to thinking people.

An epic demonstration of the inverted morality that Rand described was on display in Copenhagen last week as the world's worst most evil dictators--Mugabe and Chavez--partnered with the world's most visible and misguided progressives--Al Gore , Gordon Brown, Barack Obama--in an orgy of depravity. Sadly, even the Pope lent his moral support to the lunacy, saying, "Industrialized nations must recognize their responsibility for the environmental crisis, shed their consumerism and embrace more sober lifestyles."

John Galt, the industrialist hero of Rand's 1957 masterpiece, Atlas Shrugged, refers to those in power who stripped men of their minds, wealth and freedom, as mystics. The mystics of spirit were the religious leaders of centuries past who proclaimed that faith is superior to reason. Galt is no fan of these mystics but it is the mystics of muscle--the progressives who force us to submit to their version of the common good--that Galt despises.

And Barack Obama is a mystic of muscle in its purest form, able to corral the worshipping media, the always superficial Hollywood elites, America hating academics, state-sponsored capitalists (e.g., Goldman Sachs), and grant hungry "scientists" & environmentalists hoping to cash in on a trillion dollar loot of the American people called global warming. These are the pillars of deceit Obama used to get elected. This was how he convinced enough of us to give up our minds for the the mystical concept that Rand called the collective. True to form, Barack, master of the mystics of muscle, has used his power mightily to loot from the producers, and hand it to the parasites, crooks and undeserving (read; SEIU, ACORN, UN Climate Fund, General Motors).

John Galt leads a revolt by the productive class and outlines Rand's philosophy in his 60-page radio address. Here, he explains how human beings--alone among life forms--can choose to be mindless:
A living entity that regarded its means of survival as evil, would not survive. A plant that struggled to mangle its roots, a bird that fought to break its wings would not remain for long in the existence they affronted. But the history of man has been a struggle to deny and destroy the mind.
Sad to say, for a movement powered by the mindlessness, there is plenty of fuel to sustain "hope and change":
  • Who but the mindless can believe that government run health care will reduce costs and improve care while covering more people?

  • Who but the mindless can believe that this President is now serious about reducing the deficit after shattering spending records during his first year?

  • Who but the mindless can take seriously the sham "jobs summit" held by a President whose every policy is a lesson in job destruction?

  • Who but the mindless can believe Obama's lie that "Cash for Clunkers" which cost taxpayers $24,000 per car was successful?

  • Who but the mindless would not outraged that our government has reneged on its promise pay back the unused TARP fund to taxpayers?

  • Who but the mindless would not question the morality that the world's finest health care, which has extended and improved human life in unimaginable ways--conceived and produced by countless unsung heroes in the private sector--should magically be transformed by Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi into a "human right", taken over by the state and rationed out as they please?
  • The assault on reason by our President and Congress goes on ad infinitum. It is mindlessness that elected "hope and change" and mindlessness that sustains it. Ayn Rand recognized that the greatest struggle on earth is that between the individual and the collective, and to submit to the collective, the individual must lose his ability to think for himself. Howard Roark, hero of The Fountainhead explains;
    The mind is an attribute of the individual. There is no such thing as a collective brain.
    The last thing a mystic of muscle wants is for us to start using our minds to uncover their fraud. Galt gets to the heart of the evil of progressive demand that we all serve the state when he says,
    By the grace of reality and the nature of life, man--every man--is an end in himself, he exists for his own sake, and the achievement of his own happiness is his highest moral purpose.
    Posted by:Fred

    #11  I thank God I was made to read Atlas Shrugged when in college. The book literally changed the way I viewed collectivism and opened up new ideas I'd never given much thought of. Right now many of us are Hank Rearden.
    Posted by: Broadhead6   2009-12-29 21:34  

    #10  She's right about the headlines sounding like they came out of an Ayn Rand novel. They really do.

    Sales of her novels have spiked since Obama got elected, just like gun sales.

    The books can be difficult in places because Rand sends her characters on long, tedious rants that would never happen in real life conversations. John Galt's radio speech is particularly tedious and heavy on the Aristotle. People would be turning off their radios.

    "A is A", he says.

    Well, of course it is but can we just get on with the story?

    Rand also has trouble with the concept of God. She believes only in what can be proven and accuses preachers of misleading their flocks with appeals for compassion. Unfortunately, many preachers resemble that remark. The Archbishop of Canterbury comes to mind.

    Nonetheless, it is shocking how close Rand gets to the truth behind today's politics. Politicians will go on and on about compassion for the poor when all they really want is to steal your money so they can buy votes with it and make us all dependent on the state.

    There are people who either cannot or will not read Atlas Shrugged. It doesn't necessarily mean they are bad...Maybe they just drank the KoolAid. But you need to beware of these people.
    Posted by: Abu Uluque   2009-12-29 12:41  

    #9  She's a bit out there beyond Michele Malkin but she is obviously on the same side of the "what the heck is going on here" question that most of us here are.

    I think she's obviously concerned about the teflon coating the press and the Obama Monarchy are putting on Islam.
    Posted by: Karl Rove   2009-12-29 11:11  

    #8  Yes. She's also the author of this.
    Posted by: lotp   2009-12-29 09:03  

    #7  Ah, so she's the chica that Churls at Little Green Pusballs gets agitated over approximately once a week for supposedly being some right wing neonazi!
    Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2009-12-29 09:01  

    #6  The purpose of a thing is always itself. That's probably Aristotle. Augustine would agree.

    All altruism is just a greater perspective on self interest. Compassion is a combination of the words Cum( Latin) which means WITH and Passion ( which means to bear or suffer..where we get the word "passive").

    I personally feel uncomfortable with compassion. I know too much about Human Nature. Like William Money says in the Clint Eastwood film The Unforgiven..."we all have it coming."

    You cant afford illusions about yourself and about your enemies. Your enemies are just like you are only they are dead. Somebody wins and somebody loses. The Virtuous are probably not going to make it. Joan of Arc was just there to be used.

    The important thing is to pay attention and get there fustest with the mostest. I have always like Jubal Early, who was Lincoln's "bad old man".

    God has friends, but its always hard on His friends. Try not to get any of that on your shirt.
    And you have to remember that one of Joan of Arcs best friends was Bluebeard. No, really. And another was L'Hire. You dont want to know.

    In a tight place you dont need Dudley Doright. Trust me.
    Posted by: Angleton9   2009-12-29 08:40  

    #5  She runs the blog, "Atlas Shrugs". It is in the sidebar of Rantburg.
    Posted by: DarthVader   2009-12-29 07:05  

    #4  #2 Who's the chika?

    Pamela somebody-or-other, one of the Pajamas blog-nutters. Kind of a minor-league Michelle Malkin wannabe.
    Posted by: lex   2009-12-29 06:38  

    #3  Virtue is to be apologized for.

    How about an apology for those earrings and makeup?

    Posted by: lex   2009-12-29 06:37  

    #2  Who's the chika?
    Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-12-29 01:41  

    #1  soon to be replaced by lessons from Avatar
    Posted by: bman   2009-12-29 00:43  

    00:00