| Submit your comments on this article |
| Afghanistan |
| Does Afghanistan need a Phoenix Program? |
| 2009-12-13 |
| The Office of the Secretary of Defense hired the RAND Corporation to study the Vietnam-era Phoenix Program and recommend whether some of the program's controversial techniques might be useful in Afghanistan. RAND's researchers endorsed a Phoenix-like effort for Afghanistan and in the process, attempted to dispel some of the program's myths. What was the Phoenix program? RAND's relatively brief report summarizes its history: In 1967 the U.S. military command and the CIA created a program -- later called Phoenix -- that began as an effort to improve intelligence-sharing among a long list of U.S. and South Vietnamese agencies. Separately but at about the same time, the CIA acted to reassert its control over some South Vietnamese counterterrorism teams it had recruited. The CIA renamed these teams Provincial Reconnaissance Units (PRUs), which later became part of the Phoenix intelligence-sharing program. Former South Vietnamese soldiers, many seeking revenge against the communist Viet Cong, made up much of the PRU membership. The CIA paid and directed these teams back to their home provinces with the mission of infiltrating the Viet Cong's support infrastructure. The authors believe it was the PRU portion of Phoenix that became the subject of enduring myths both good and bad. Opponents of Phoenix condemned the program as little more than an illegal assassination rampage which killed many innocent of any involvement with the Viet Cong. Proponents credited Phoenix with virtually eliminating the Viet Cong insurgency, leaving it up to the North Vietnamese army to conquer the south. The new study discounts both of these perspectives. RAND does, however, record Phoenix as an overall success, both for its ability to gain detailed knowledge about the Viet Cong and its ability to disrupt that organization. The authors believe the U.S. counterinsurgency efforts in both Iraq and Afghanistan have suffered because the U.S. has apparently failed to aggressively recruit motivated indigenous agents to infiltrate and break up insurgent organizations. Why wouldn't the U.S. want to resurrect Phoenix? Infiltrating insurgent organizations would seem to be a basic counterinsurgency tactic. However, the report reminds us of one more thing: fairly or unfairly, Phoenix was very costly to the U.S. government's reputation. The ruthlessness displayed by some unit members resulted in propaganda opportunities for opponents of the U.S. effort in Vietnam. The Vietnam War was ultimately decided on the information battlefield. That will also be the case in Afghanistan. Rand report mentioned above is found at this Link. |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #3 During the occupation of Germany until about 1948 or so, there were German insurgents. When we caught them, we lined them up and shot them in firing squads. There is a recent documentary on the History channel about the occupation of Germany that might be worth watching. |
| Posted by: crosspatch 2009-12-13 15:36 |
| #2 Call it the Head Start Program. The pinks will be running in circles for years. |
| Posted by: ed 2009-12-13 12:03 |
| #1 propaganda opportunities for opponents of the U.S. effort in Vietnam the Libs and Media here at home didn't need the Phoenix program to damage morale and spread propaganda. Look at Gitmo now. It's well run, a success by any measure, and the Libtards still clamor to shut it down |
| Posted by: Frank G 2009-12-13 10:01 |