You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
TSA manual misstep leads to discipline
2009-12-11
The Department of Homeland Security has initiated unspecified actions against personnel involved in the bungled online posting this spring of a government document that revealed airport screening secrets, Secretary Janet Napolitano told senators Wednesday.

A contract employee was responsible for not properly redacting a 93-page Transportation Security Administration operating manual that was put on a government procurement Web site, allowing computer users to recover blacked-out information by copying and pasting it into other documents, Napolitano said. TSA supervisors were also involved, she said.
I know, let's draw and quarter the contract employee! And make sure to hire a few more to use as human shields for next time we screw up.
"The security of the traveling public has never been put at risk," Napolitano assured the Senate Judiciary Committee at an oversight hearing, repeating earlier TSA statements that the document was out of date, never implemented and had been revised six times after the breach.
So why is it a classified document, and why were you still playing with it? And why all the fuss?
She said DHS Inspector General Richard Skinner is conducting an independent review of the incident, in addition to TSA's Office of Inspections.

"We have already initiated personnel action against the individuals involved in this," she Napolitano told panel Chairman Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), without elaborating. "We have already instituted an internal review to determine what else needs to be done to make sure this incident never recurs."
How about having a department that deals with document security? Works for everyone else.
The TSA confirmed Tuesday that the document was posted online as part of a contract solicitation. The manual details procedures for screening passengers and checked baggage, such as technical settings used by X-ray machines and explosives detectors.
Posted by:gorb

#3  SSI isn't a classification, it's a handling label, and it requires more security in any form of electronic transmission, including encryption and transmission of the keyword in a separate email for example, and it has need to know criteria. Thats about handling not content.
Based on content, even at the FOUO/SSI level, posting this is an amzing screwup. Even without the redacted portions that were later recovered, it is a daily ops manual that is a perfect diagnostic tool for opposition forces to use to defeat the TSA systems. Amazing level of stupidity and naive judgement!
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2009-12-11 13:36  

#2  Napolitano could offer up the Head of the TSA as a sacrificial goat. Except that there hasn't been anyone in the top-slot at the TSA for nearly a year.
Posted by: Pappy   2009-12-11 11:30  

#1  From the Murphy's Law Calendar:

"Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement."

So:

Missteps lead to discipline. Lack of discipline leads to missteps...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2009-12-11 11:05  

00:00