You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Boxer: Hackers should face criminal probe over 'Climategate'
2009-12-03
One of the necessary steps in the road to undoing the stupidity of 'global warming' is to allow nutters like Babbling Babs to say stupid stuff in public. People will come to understand that the same ignoramuses who want the leaked e-mails prosecuted are the same ones who applauded the release of the Pentagon Papers and the Bush administration memos on the war on terrorism.

The sooner the public sees that, the sooner the public will come to understand that the leaked e-mails really are serious and really do undermine 'global warming'.
Leaked e-mails allegedly undermining climate change science should be treated as a criminal matter, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said Wednesday afternoon. Boxer, the top Democrat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said that the recently released e-mails, showing scientists allegedly overstating the case for climate change, should be treated as a crime.

"You call it 'Climategate'; I call it 'E-mail-theft-gate,'" she said during a committee meeting. "Whatever it is, the main issue is, Are we facing global warming or are we not? I'm looking at these e-mails, that, even though they were stolen, are now out in the public."

The e-mails, from scientists at the University of East Anglia, were obtained through hacking. The messages showed the director of the university's Climate Research Unit discussing ways to strengthen the unit's case for global warming. Climate change skeptics have seized on the e-mails, arguing that they demonstrate manipulation in environmental science.
They also demonstrate arrogance, subversion of the scientific method, a willingness to destroy the careers of critics, and perhaps even outright fraud.
Boxer said her committee may hold hearings into the matter as its top Republican, Sen. James Inhofe (Okla.), has asked for, but that a criminal probe would be part of any such hearings.

"We may well have a hearing on this, we may not. We may have a briefing for senators, we may not," Boxer said. "Part of our looking at this will be looking at a criminal activity which could have well been coordinated.
While you're at it Babbles, how about prosecuting the two young folks who videoed the ACORN offices? Think of the publicity you'd have.
"This is a crime," Boxer said.
I do not think that word means what you think it means.
Posted by:Steve White

#17  The NYT leaks and blows up one of our best intell gathering operations and she thinks we should give the Times a medal and jail to the NSA.

This time she wants to punish the leakers...I guess it depends on your agenda.
Posted by: Karl Rove   2009-12-03 23:21  

#16  When in doubt, shoot the messenger.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2009-12-03 13:47  

#15  I don't recall BB getting all this upset when Daniel Elsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers. She was a local pol then, not fed.
Posted by: Bigfoot Glineling8764   2009-12-03 11:32  

#14  Can we send her to Russia to investigate?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2009-12-03 11:28  

#13  Procop:
You pummel a man in wheelchair in St Louis and you get misdemeanor charges.

I thought the charges were reduced to just an ordinance violation? As Judge Napolitano said - equivalent of jay-walking.
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-12-03 09:42  

#12  Rambler in Virginia: watch it, do you know how many votes she had to buy to get that title?
Posted by: HammerHead   2009-12-03 08:36  

#11  So if an informant came forward with an assassination plot that was acquired from a hacking technique, would GED Boxer take the same approach, or would that person be hailed as a hero accompanied by a vigorous investigation?
Posted by: HammerHead   2009-12-03 08:35  

#10  Boxer can not resist any chance to show how stupid she is and yet her electorate morons keep voting her back.
Posted by: 3dc   2009-12-03 08:07  

#9  Well, Ma'am, considering that they originated at a facility in the UK, and once obtained, the emails and code fragments were originally posted on a server in Russia, I'm sure your jurisdiction over the matter is precisely....zilch.
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2009-12-03 07:41  

#8  What do you expect? You pummel a man in wheelchair in St Louis and you get misdemeanor charges. You give a blood lust killer a fat lip and you get Court Martial. You engage in one of the most egregious cases of voter intimidation since the 1960s and you get the charges dropped. The Donks lived vicariously with every 'leak' for the last 8 years pushing their agenda and never once care about the legitimacy of the leak or leaker, but what damage it could do against their opponent. Now Bab's is whining that someone else is playing their game of power. You set the standards girl, live with it.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-12-03 07:31  

#7  The e-mails... were obtained through hacking.

No they weren't. They were leaked by a whistleblower. Whoever did this is a hero, not a criminal.
Posted by: Parabellum   2009-12-03 07:16  

#6  Maybe to Babs --oops, I mean SENATOR Babs, the UK is just one of the Democrats 57 states.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2009-12-03 07:02  

#5  The computer was in Britain. Its not a criminal matter as far as the US government is concerned anyway.
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2009-12-03 06:12  

#4  It's my understanding that the university they were "working" at screwed up and made the location public and they got nabbed at that point.
Posted by: gorb   2009-12-03 06:02  

#3  More likely the file was placed in a location that someone else had access to and they grabbed a copy. I agree with phil_b, I seriously doubt any "hacking" went on at all.

Posted by: crosspatch   2009-12-03 04:09  

#2  It's not clear the docs were obtained by hacking. They could have been released by someone with legitimate access who wanted to expose what was going on.
Posted by: phil_b   2009-12-03 04:00  

#1  No one should have a degree if they hide scientific facts, period.

Boxer is stupid and not a scientist so she is just the shopping cart lady to me. The rest may get bent. This fraud is over.
Posted by: newc   2009-12-03 00:29  

00:00