You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Google to limit free news access
2009-12-03
Newspaper publishers will now be able to set a limit on the number of free news articles people can read through Google, the company has announced. The concession follows claims from some media companies that the search engine is profiting from online news pages.

Under the First Click Free programme, publishers can now prevent unrestricted access to subscription websites.

Users who click on more than five articles in a day may be routed to payment or registration pages. "Previously, each click from a user would be treated as free," Google senior business product manager Josh Cohen said in a blog post. "Now, we've updated the programme so that publishers can limit users to no more than five pages per day without registering or subscribing."

Google users may start seeing registration pages appear when they click for a sixth time on any given day at websites of publishers using the programme, according to Mr Cohen. This will only affect websites that currently charge for content.

'Significant move'
The announcement is seen as a reaction to concerns in the newspaper industry that Google is using newspaper content unfairly.

Media tycoon Rupert Murdoch, the chairman and chief executive of Newscorp, has accused firms such as Google of profiting from journalism by generating advertising revenue by linking readers to newspaper articles.

Some readers have discovered they can avoid paying subscription fees to newspaper websites by calling up their pages via Google.
Posted by:Fred

#2  Thanks Google! I just changed my search settings to Yahoo.
Posted by: ed   2009-12-03 07:34  

#1  Do the publishers really think this will help them? That the use was unfair? They might have a point about Google's tendency to parasitism (I despise Google and it's holier than thou attitude, and have felt so since its inception) but then they would have to consider who would ever go to their sites if they were subscription only. I for one would not and will not pay a dime, ever. With 'thinking' like this they will drive themselves below ground even faster, not that I think that would be a bad thing.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2009-12-03 03:58  

00:00