| Submit your comments on this article | |
| -Signs, Portents, and the Weather- | |
| O Not Fanatic Enough on Global Warming; Maldives to Disappear | |
| 2009-11-22 | |
| A WaPo Editorial by Bill McKibben. Who? Here's a story of two presidents, Barack Obama of the United States and Mohamed Nasheed of the Maldives. Both are young and charismatic. Both were elected last fall to replace discredited incumbents (Nasheed's predecessor ruled the island nation for three decades and kept him in a political prison for years). Both have troublesome legislatures (the opposition party controls the chamber in the Maldives). But on the biggest question the planet faces -- if we'll take action in time to slow down global warming -- they couldn't be more different. One, Nasheed, is leading the fight. The other, as we saw last weekend when he announced that there would be no new treaty anytime soon, is only half in the battle. They both may go to the U.N.-sponsored climate conference in Copenhagen next month, but Nasheed will be there to say: Seize the moment. And if Obama makes it, he will be there to spin, to say, no doubt elegantly: Chill. To understand the difference between the two men is to understand much of the politics of global warming, as well as the chances for an agreement on climate change -- this year or next -- significant enough to matter. In Nasheed's case, geography almost requires him to be outspoken. His nation is what you picture when you picture paradise: 1,200 tiny islands, each ringed by a reef with a lagoon, white sand beaches and coconut palms. A small fraction have been turned into tourist resorts, but most are either uninhabited or home to fishing communities that go back thousands of years. But the highest point on most of those islands is only a few feet above sea level. They can't cope with the rising oceans that every expert says global warming will bring, and they can't cope with the dying corals that come when seawater gets hotter and more acidic. And so, more than any other leader on Earth, Nasheed has made global warming his rallying cry. He's versed in the latest science. He knows, for instance, that trying to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius and atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide to 450 parts per million is no longer a viable goal. That given what science now shows, the much tougher target of 350 parts per million represents his country's only chance for survival. As Rajendra Pachauri, the only scientist ever to accept the Nobel Prize for his work on climate, said this month: At 450 ppm, the Maldives and many other islands, as well as larger low-lying countries such as Bangladesh, "will be completely devastated." So Nasheed has gone to work. Some of his actions have been symbolic: As part of a global day of climate action that I helped organize, he trained his entire cabinet to scuba dive so they could hold an underwater meeting on an endangered coral reef; they signed a resolution to be presented at the Copenhagen summit demanding that nations take steps to return the atmosphere's carbon level to 350 parts per million. And some of his actions have been entirely practical: To show its willingness to lead, the Maldives (a poor nation) has committed to being carbon neutral by 2020. There are lots of wind towers on the way, and I've seen plans for farming seaweed to make biofuels. Contrast that with Obama. He too has acted; in fact, he's done more than his three predecessors combined. He's taken admirable steps on automobile fuel economy, put stimulus money into green job plans and surrounded himself with an excellent cast of scientific advisers. But doing more than George W. Bush on global warming is like doing more than George Wallace on racial healing. It gives you political cover, but the melting arctic ice is unimpressed. So it's not good news that, internationally, Obama's spokesmen have stuck to the 450 ppm/2 degree target, calling it consensus science when it no longer is. And it's not good news domestically that Obama turned climate legislation over to Congress to produce, slotting it behind health care on his list of priorities. Since he'd just spent some years in the Senate, the president should have been able to predict what would happen: The already none-too-strong Waxman-Markey (House) and Kerry-Boxer (Senate) bills have been laden with ever more gifts to ever more special interests and ever more loopholes to undermine their targets. And now the Senate legislation has apparently been handed to Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) for some more tweaking, an exercise that, from a scientific point of view, seems unlikely to end well. Obama's excuse is that the Senate won't sign tough climate legislation, so there's no use pushing for it. (And he's right -- the Senate is tough. At 350.org, an organization I co-founded that is dedicated to solving the climate crisis, we're working to organize candlelight vigils at senators' offices around the country.) But that's conceding the game without taking a shot -- he hasn't done any of the things Nasheed has tried to rally his nation and other nations. Much more at link, but why bother. You get the idea.
| |
| Posted by:Bobby |
| #5 The Maldives have the most carbon (dioxide) intensive economy on Earth. Their economy is almost entirely dependent on long haul tourism in CO2 spewing jets. Their hypocrisy is impressive. Otherwise, sea levels around the Maldives are well documented and haven't risen for a 100 years. |
| Posted by: phil_b 2009-11-22 20:28 |
| #4 It looks like we have colonists to repopulate Somalia with after we cleanse the place of the scum and villainy from the Horn of Africa. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2009-11-22 19:56 |
| #3 Geez, Joe, if you don't put a lid on it Lubos is going to start hanging out over here. |
| Posted by: KBK 2009-11-22 19:21 |
| #2 FYI, IMO in order for the SUN to expand, its own gravitational = Electro-magnetic fields must weaken. However, this in turn will also destabilz the normal or regular orbits of the entire planetary system includ INNER PLANETS, ETC. * 1980s's MTV "B52'S" > "LOVE SHACK" > Oh, MERCURY, you've been thru every degree ...". MERCURY = "WINGED HORSE" OF PEGASUS which IIRC PROPHET MOHAMMED rode to heaven upon his death "THIRD SECRET" Vatican release > the WINGED HORSE was riderless, whilset the POPE was being shot at by people armed wid CROSSBOWS [Asia], + OLD-STYLE GUNS [Western "Red" Revolutionaries = Social Contracts]. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2009-11-22 19:03 |
| #1 Ditto for PALAU/BELAU,and simil affected MICRONESIAN ISLES also. * SPACE ARKS * COMPUETR-CONTROLLED ENCLOSED SURFACE CITIES, ala "LOGAN'S RUN"??? * DITTO UNDERGROUND CITIES * HONG-KONG- SHANGHAI-style living on CHIN JUNKS = OCEAN CITIES * FLOATING HOMES, VILLAGES e.g. built on pylons, piers. SAN FRANCISCO'S "FISHERMAN'S WHARF" goes GLOBAL = OWG-NWO. Pragmatically, the only real question to ask vee GLOBAL WARMING = EX-POTUS DUBYA is what do our best PERTS + SOLAR THEORIES-MODELS have to say about the condition of the Sun, e.g. LACK OF SUNSPOTS = ENERGIES BUILDING UP INSIDE THE SOLAR ENGINEERING UNIT that are not able to be released??? Again, THIRD SECRET OF FATIMA > "DANCE OF THE SUN" > in FUTURE TIME, the Earth being knocked off its normal orbit by a catastrophic event [e.g. SPACE ROCK "X"]. IRONY > despite its horrors, the Earth is knocked off its orbit far enuff away to MINIMIZE EFFECTS FROM ANY POTENTIAL SOLAR EXPANSION, THUS ALLOWING HUMANITY'S SURVIVORS TO BEGIN ANEW. MESSAGE > EVEN DURING "THE APOCALYPSE" PER SE, GOD GIVES HUMANITY = HIS CREATION A CHANCE TO REDEEM ITSELF. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2009-11-22 18:48 |