| Submit your comments on this article |
| Science & Technology |
| Antimatter Detected In Lightning |
| 2009-11-07 |
| Designed to scan the heavens thousands to billions of light-years beyond the solar system for gamma rays, the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope has also picked up a shocking vibe from Earth. During its first 14 months of operation, the flying observatory has detected 17 gamma-ray flashes associated with terrestrial storms — and some of those flashes have contained a surprising signature of antimatter. During two recent lightning storms, Fermi recorded gamma-ray emissions of a particular energy that could have been produced only by the decay of energetic positrons, the antimatter equivalent of electrons. The observations are the first of their kind for lightning storms. Michael Briggs of the University of Alabama in Huntsville announced the puzzling findings November 5 at the 2009 Fermi Symposium. It’s a surprise to have found the signature of positrons during a lightning storm, Briggs said. The17 flashes Fermi detected occurred just before, during and immediately after lightning strikes, as tracked by the World Wide Lightning Location Network. During lightning storms previously observed by other spacecraft, energetic electrons moving toward the craft slowed down and produced gamma rays. The unusual positron signature seen by Fermi suggests that the normal orientation for an electric field associated with a lightning storm somehow reversed, Briggs said. Modelers are now working to figure out how the field reversal could have occurred. But for now, he said, the answer is up in the air. Recording gamma-ray flashes — which have the potential to harm airplanes in storms — isn’t new. The first were found by NASA’s Compton Gamma-ray Observatory in the early 1990s. NASA’s RHESSI satellite, which primarily looks at X-ray and gamma-ray emissions from the sun, has found some 800 terrestrial gamma-ray flashes, Briggs noted. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose |
| #4 James, the distinction is really meaningless. x-rays = gamma rays as the energies go, it is just it has been decided as a convention that x-rays are emitted by electrons and gamma by nucleus. The question is whether the energy of the emissions recorded by Fermi is only possible by decay of positrons, or is explainable by something that does not require antimatter. |
| Posted by: twobyfour 2009-11-07 23:41 |
| #3 Umm... Actually we get perfectly good gamma rays from energetic electrons in a strong magnetic field. |
| Posted by: James 2009-11-07 21:55 |
| #2 No. A natural process occurrence. Some people recognized that electric storms generate x-rays almost a century ago. They were considered crack pots. But, Fermi dudes may be a bit presumptive in their observations. It may be shorter wavelength x-rays over the boundary of 100 keV, rather than gamma rays (the wavelengths overlap--the two types of radiation are now usually distinguished by their origin: X-rays are emitted by electrons outside the nucleus, while gamma rays are emitted by the nucleus). So if that is the case and the detected radiation is x-rays, no antimatter is needed. Note the part: "During lightning storms previously observed by other spacecraft, energetic electrons moving toward the craft slowed down and produced gamma rays." According to the convention, electrons emit x-rays, not gamma-rays. QED |
| Posted by: twobyfour 2009-11-07 21:05 |
| #1 any relation in time to that bird dropping french bread on the CERN system? |
| Posted by: 3dc 2009-11-07 17:24 |