You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Ares Rocket Test a Soaring Success | VIDEO
2009-10-28
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#7  I would love to drop a bug in NASA's ear and use the Dummy load to loft "Rods from God" into orbit, 40 tons is a lotta kaboom if done right, say one ton each? That's equal to 40 nukes, and a hell of a lot cheaper as well.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-10-28 22:35  

#6  Solid rockets are far cheaper and safer than liquid fuel rocket engines. The Space Shuttle's solid boosters are around $40M each, the R&D paid for and reusable, though it's probably cheaper to just throw them away.
Posted by: ed   2009-10-28 21:50  

#5  I'm sorry to say, but it all looks so lacking in real innovation.

Rivets FFS.

It's still at heart a big firework. Maybe I'm just on a downer today but I feel real innovation in launches will only come with some market driven innovation.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-10-28 21:18  

#4  "Imagine if the air force conducted close air support by crashing F-22's into enemy targets."

You mean like the Iranians Pakistanis Russians Chinese Syrians NorKs, Thing? ;-p
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-10-28 20:43  

#3  ION PAKISTANI DEFENCE FORUMS > EUROPE'S SCIENTISTS WANT TO MAKE AN ARTIFICIAL SUN IN 2018.

Constant Nukulaar engine.

D *** NG IT, BUT CAN YOU MAKE STAR WARS' "TIE FIGHTERS/X-WINGS" WITH IT, or does that Guy from Guam have to do it [again]???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-10-28 20:41  

#2  It's another shuttle; it'll cost hundreds of millions of dollars per _flight_.

Whether this test is a success or a failure, the whole program is built around the idea that the main problem with the shuttle is that it was reusable and there is nothing whatsoever wrong with building large solid rockets to launch really big payloads into orbit.

This first-stage plus dummy cost 400 million dollars. If the completed vehicle is cost-comparable to the shuttle, it'll cost about 600-800 million per launch.

Imagine if the air force conducted close air support by crashing F-22's into enemy targets.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2009-10-28 20:37  

#1  Lots of people wanted this to fail. Check all the general topic blogs that usually have an orgasm over anything space-related and note the sound of crickets. Whatever the bureaucratic outcome down the road, good for the propellerheads at NASA today...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2009-10-28 16:12  

00:00