| Submit your comments on this article |
| Britain |
| Labour cynically plotted to transform the entire make-up of Britain without telling us |
| 2009-10-26 |
| So now the cat is well and truly out of the bag. For years, as the number of immigrants to Britain shot up apparently uncontrollably, the question was how exactly this had happened. Was it through a fit of absent-mindedness or gross incompetence? Or was it not inadvertent at all, but deliberate? The latter explanation seemed just too outrageous. After all, a deliberate policy of mass immigration would have amounted to nothing less than an attempt to change the very make-up of this country without telling the electorate. There could not have been a more grave abuse of the entire democratic process. Now, however, we learn that this is exactly what did happen. The Labour government has been engaged upon a deliberate and secret policy of national cultural sabotage. This astonishing revelation surfaced quite casually last weekend in a newspaper article by one Andrew Neather. He turns out to have been a speech writer for Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett. And it was he who wrote a landmark speech in September 2000 by the then immigration minister, Barbara Roche, that called for a loosening of immigration controls. But the true scope and purpose of this new policy was actively concealed. In its 1997 election manifesto, Labour promised 'firm control over immigration' and in 2005 it promised a 'crackdown on abuse'. In 2001, its manifesto merely said that the immigration rules needed to reflect changes to the economy to meet skills shortages. But all this concealed a monumental shift of policy. For Neather wrote that until 'at least February last year', when a new points-based system was introduced to limit foreign workers in response to increasing uproar, the purpose of the policy Roche ushered in was to open up the UK to mass immigration. This has been achieved. Some 2.3million migrants have been added to the population since 2001. Since 1997, the number of work permits has quadrupled to 120,000 a year. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1222977/MELANIE-PHILLIPS-The-outrageous-truth-slips-Labour-cynically-plotted-transform-entire-make-Britain-telling-us.html#ixzz0V4tXXPNU |
| Posted by:tipper |
| #4 I hate to see Britain going completely racist and fascist with the BNP but I also hate to see them going Muslim. I wonder if guys like Gordon Brown ever consider just how dangerous a game they are playing. In the book I'm reading now about Richard Nixon, self proclaimed segregationist George Wallace was a factor in the 1968 election. That was due largely to white backlash from Lyndon Johnson's civil rights policies. Now, I know a lot of people think Nixon was bad, but he was certainly no George Wallace even if he did make deals with Wallace's co-confederate Strom Thurmond to get votes in the southern states. After the election, Wallace claimed a moral victory saying that Nixon had said the same things he did. Nixon confided to some of his aids that he basically did as Wallace claimed but that he said the things in a nicer way. Well, Nixon was just a whole lot smarter than Wallace. My question is, will the Conservatives be smarter than the BNP or will Labor divide and conquer? If Britain's Conservatives are anything like today's American Republicans the outlook is not good as indicated by the performances of George Bush and John McCain who might just as well have been Democrats when it comes to immigration policy. Another white backlash is brewing but there doesn't seem to be any George Wallace in sight. Conservatives and Republicans just don't get it. They're still trying to play a gentleman's game when the fact is they're up against a bunch of godless communist bastards. |
| Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2009-10-26 12:12 |
| #3 If true, or more realistically if this is believed (even if untrue), this might end Labor as a force in British politics for some time. Just as Obama might see the Democratic Party machine set back a decade or so by the time he's done. Hopefully we'll survive as industrial powers long enough. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2009-10-26 07:46 |
| #2 "And the fact is that, despite his blithe assertions to the contrary, schools in areas of very high immigration find it desperately difficult to cope with so many children who don't even have basic English. ... It also conveniently guaranteed an increasingly Labour-voting electorate since, as a recent survey by the Electoral Commission has revealed, some 90 per cent of black people and three-quarters of Asians vote Labour." The Left loves nothing more than a divided (e.g. 'multicultural') electorate as it's so much easier for an unrepresentative element to hold power through divide and rule. And the Left also benefits from an ill-informed or mis-educated, constituency (see the many bloody red revolutions and insurgencies in second and third world countries). And the Left is also utterly unscrupulous in its diabolic ambition for power and control. Left wing politics exists only to reproduce itself at the expense of its host. |
| Posted by: Bulldog 2009-10-26 05:19 |
| #1 Exactly the same thing has happened in Australia. |
| Posted by: Phil_B 2009-10-26 03:42 |