You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
A Hitch in Iran's Nuclear Plans?
2009-10-22
By David Ignatius

Since you're probably not a regular reader of the trade publication Nucleonics Week, let me summarize an article that appeared in its Oct. 8 issue. It reported that Iran's supply of low-enriched uranium -- the potential feedstock for nuclear bombs -- appears to have certain "impurities" that "could cause centrifuges to fail" if the Iranians try to boost it to weapons grade.

Now that's interesting. The seeming breakthrough in negotiations on Oct. 1 in Geneva -- where Iran agreed to send most of its estimated 1,500 kilograms of low-enriched uranium abroad for further enrichment -- may not have been exactly what it appeared. Iran may have had no alternative but to seek foreign help in enrichment because its own centrifuges wouldn't work.
Or they could buy their enriched uranium from the Norks ...
"The impurities, certain metallic fluoride compounds, would interfere with centrifuge enrichment" at Iran's facility at Natanz, reported the newsletter's Bonn correspondent, Mark Hibbs.

This news strikes me as a potential bombshell. If the Nucleonics Week report is accurate (and there's some uncertainty among experts about how serious the contamination problem is), the Iranian nuclear program is in much worse shape than most analysts had realized. The contaminated fuel it has produced so far would be all but useless for nuclear weapons. To make enough fuel for a bomb, Iran might have to start over -- this time avoiding the impurities.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  The US had problems going the other way.

Operation Castle Bravo was a test of the first deliverable fusion weapon in the US arsenal. The predicted yield was 5 megatons, but, in fact, "BRAVO" yielded 14.8 megatons, making it the largest U.S. nuclear test ever exploded.

There were some fusion reactions taking place that were not predicted at the time.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2009-10-22 22:29  

#4  Algeria is interested in mining their vast uranium reserves.
Posted by: newc   2009-10-22 09:56  

#3  And maybe Iran just contaminated a sample to fool the rest of the world into believing this.

And couldn't France or whoever just recontaminate the Uranium when finished with it? Seems to me weapons grade is closer to 90%, but I'm probably wrong.
Posted by: gorb   2009-10-22 01:38  

#2  then again, maybe not. Cast your lots.
Posted by: Jumbo Slinerong5015   2009-10-22 00:41  

#1  Sounds like IRAN may have a simil problem as INDIA'S PAST NUCTESTS, i.e. nuke explosive yields not as great as calculated or occurred, ala BHARAT RAKSHAK.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-10-22 00:13  

00:00