| Submit your comments on this article |
| Africa Horn |
| Obama Drops Plan to Isolate Sudan Leaders |
| 2009-10-18 |
| The Obama administration has formulated a new policy for Sudan that proposes working with that country's government, rather than isolating it as President Obama had pledged to do during his campaign. In an interview on Friday, President Obama's special envoy to Sudan, Maj. Gen. J. Scott Gration, retired, said the policy, to be announced Monday by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, would make use of a mix of "incentives and pressure" to seek an end to the human rights abuses that have left millions of people dead or displaced while burning Darfur into the American conscience. General Gration said the administration would set strict time lines for President Omar al-Bashir of Sudan to fulfill the conditions of a 2005 peace agreement that his government signed with rebels in southern Sudan. Under that agreement, independence for southern Sudan is to be put to a vote in 2011. "To advance peace and security in Sudan, we must engage with allies and with those with whom we disagree," said a statement of the policy that was obtained by The New York Times. General Gration said the administration's new approach was also intended to prevent Sudan, which once provided refuge to Osama bin Laden, from again serving as a terrorist haven. During his campaign, Mr. Obama criticized the Bush administration for doing too little to stop the killing. His new policy, the result of months of vigorous and heated debate within the administration, signals a significant shift in the president's thinking, which his aides say is a reflection of changing facts on the ground. In recent months, analysts from both inside and outside the United States government have reported that "low-intensity" skirmishes replaced systematic slaughter by government-supported militants on one side and rebel groups on the other. Villages are no longer being burned down at the same rate, although some say that is because there are few villages left to burn. Crime has replaced warfare as the biggest threat to civilians. And intelligence officials say Sudan has provided important cooperation in the United States' fight against terrorists. The Obama administration continues to use the word genocide to characterize the killings in Sudan, and aides acknowledged that the word loomed large in their months of deliberations. But Michael Abramowitz, director of the Committee on Conscience at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, wrote on the committee's Web site, "Now conditions in Sudan have changed. We believe it is most accurate to place Darfur and the rest of Sudan in our 'genocide warning' category." A senior administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said, "People were wrestling with the question of how to deal with the fact that to get to the best-case scenario -- which is to change the behavior of the Khartoum government -- we are going to have to work with a government responsible for so many atrocities." |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #6 It seems the "problem from hell" has become the discomfort we can live with. |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2009-10-18 13:25 |
| #5 Being black, it's _OK_ for Obama to side with arabs trying to ethnically cleanse their country of darkie untermenschen without drawing any anger or criticism from the blacks here in the US. Sooner or later, I'd like to hear an explanation from a liberal as to whether they have any _real_ reasons for disliking Hitler, other than him being an underachieving loser. |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2009-10-18 13:25 |
| #4 In recent months, analysts from both inside and outside the United States government have reported that "low-intensity" skirmishes replaced systematic slaughter by government-supported militants on one side and rebel groups on the other. Villages are no longer being burned down at the same rate, although some say that is because there are few villages left to burn. "See - if you dither long enough, the problem solves itself!" |
| Posted by: Pappy 2009-10-18 12:26 |
| #3 Why I'm not surprised? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2009-10-18 02:02 |
| #2 The BOA (big O administration) will get as much traction out of this policy as their approach to Iran. Reminds me of the Onion video of the Big O deciding to make it his policy to start a dialogue and negotiation with the southern California wildfires. |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2009-10-18 01:20 |
| #1 Ah, I see the Hondurans problem. They didn't kill 2 million of their |
| Posted by: ed 2009-10-18 01:08 |