You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Leader of the Free World no more
2009-09-27
Israel is looking like the new leader of the Free World. The previous leader, the United States, resigned this role last week at the United Nations to take the position of global community organizer. This was made plain by President Obama in his speech, titled "Responsibility for Our Common Future," in which he heralded "a new chapter of international cooperation." By contrast, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered a blunt and forceful call to action in the central challenge facing free people today. This is the struggle of "civilization against barbarism" being fought by "those who sanctify life against those who glorify death."

Mr. Obama's address was the predictable mix of criticism of the past policies of the United States, self-praise for correcting said policies and vague calls to united action on matters of collective interest. It sought to ingratiate rather than offend. But Mr. Netanyahu chastised the United Nations for its "systematic assault on the truth." He spoke truths that Mr. Obama would never whisper regarding the regime in Iran, which is "fueled by an extreme fundamentalism" and an "unforgiving creed." Mr. Netanyahu rebuked those members who countenanced Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's diatribe before the same world body, rightly calling it a "disgrace."

Mr. Netanyahu repeatedly paid tribute to the blessings of liberty and "the allure of freedom." He marveled at the technological advances freedom made possible. He asked if the international community would support the Iranian people "as they bravely stand up for freedom." He envisioned a future of Israel and Palestine, "two free peoples living in peace, living in prosperity, living in dignity." Mr. Obama, meanwhile, touted the imperative of responding to global climate change and mentioned as an afterthought that democracy should not be an afterthought.

Israel stands out because it understands the central challenge faced by the civilized world and by its willingness to take action. Israel is readying to stem the tide of barbarism and stand up to the threat of a nuclear Iran. In return, it asks only for moral support. "If Israel is again asked to take more risk for peace," Mr. Netanyahu said, "we must know today that you will stand with us tomorrow." He challenged the countries of the world with a clear-cut test: "Will you stand with Israel? Or will you stand with the terrorists?"

Mr. Obama said in closing that "we call on all nations to join us in building the future that our people deserve." But people only deserve what they have earned. Mr. Netanyahu called on the civilized world to "confront this peril, secure our future, and, God willing, forge an enduring peace for generations to come." Sometimes the future doesn't come without a fight.
Posted by:Fred

#11  But people only deserve what they have earned.

Not according to Bambi.
Posted by: mojo   2009-09-27 22:37  

#10  The full implications of Obama's election were not apparent to most of the electorate last October.

I hope some huge disaster is not created as the result bumbling, indecision, arrogance, narcissism and naivete. Neville Chamberlain comes to mind.
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-09-27 15:32  

#9  In a June 2007 speech Obama said "Whatever we once were, we're no longer a Christian nation. At least not just. We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, and a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation and a nation of nonbelievers"

This is actually the Left's corrupt and debased definition of democracy, much closer to the old "People's Democratic Republic". It's a democracy of special interests where in each interest is equal in voice rather than each person. Thus small factions have as much power and standing as large factions. Each block has 'equal' say in the process regardless of the classical definition of democracy.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-09-27 11:01  

#8  In a June 2007 speech Obama said "Whatever we once were, we're no longer a Christian nation. At least not just. We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, and a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation and a nation of nonbelievers"

He has given variations of that meme in speeches on at least three separate occasions. Of course, he realizes that population-wise, this is a Christian nation (76% according to Pew). Given his agenda, it's in his best interests to undermine the Christian-Judeo values upon which we were founded.

I'm old enough to have witnessed many of this nation's leaders lead us in prayer throughout our difficult times, or at the very least, appeal to a higher power for guidance.

I won't hold my breath waiting for any such appeal from the Kenyan.



Posted by: Woozle Uneter9007   2009-09-27 10:46  

#7  I fear "the full implications of Obama's election" are still not apparent.

Unfortunately, I agree. People don't like to be fooled and they really don't like having to admit it.

It means that they weren't paying attention to the signs and warnings that many of us recognized without having to read between the lines. The bastard telegraphed his intentions loud and clear and those now feeling somewhat swindled may be willing to believe the whitewashed lies of the MSM rather than their own eyes.
Posted by: Woozle Uneter9007   2009-09-27 10:35  

#6   I fear "the full implications of Obama's election" are still not apparent.

B, I'm afraid that the implications are all too apparent. The ultimate consequences of those implications are still to come.
Posted by: AlanC   2009-09-27 10:29  

#5  I fear "the full implications of Obama's election" are still not apparent.
Posted by: Besoeker in Duitsland   2009-09-27 10:20  

#4  The full implications of Obama's election were not apparent to most of the electorate last October. Obama and his ilk have been tolerated by them as a legitimate part of our political debate for far too long. One beneficial outcome to this period will be if the scales fall from the eyes of the electorate and they see the Obamanation for the enemy of American ideals it is.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2009-09-27 09:23  

#3  In a June 2007 speech Obama said “Whatever we once were, weÂ’re no longer a Christian nation. At least not just. We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, and a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation and a nation of nonbelievers”

and 1+1=3 - Welcome to the world of "change"
Posted by: Omavick Sforza7752   2009-09-27 08:07  

#2  Hope!

And shame, at the same time. When will this foolish little man remove the "Kick Me" sign from his back and start acting like the leader of the free world?

Oops, silly me. There is no "free world" anymore. Sorry for being arrogant. Won't happen again, nyet, nikogda, kommandeer.
Posted by: lex   2009-09-27 04:55  

#1  I would call this article "A voice in the wildness".
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-09-27 03:40  

00:00