You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Palin emphasizes the need for a grassroots rebirth of the Republican Party
2009-09-23
HONG KONG -- Sarah Palin, in what was billed as her first speech overseas, spoke on Wednesday to Asian bankers, investors and fund managers.

A number of people who heard the speech in a packed hotel ballroom, which was closed to the media, said Mrs. Palin spoke from notes for 90 minutes and that she was articulate, well-prepared and even compelling.

"The speech was wide-ranging, very balanced, and she beat all expectations," said Doug A. Coulter, head of private equity in the Asia-Pacific region for LGT Capital Partners.

"She didn't sound at all like a far-right-wing conservative. She seemed to be positioning herself as a libertarian or a small-c conservative," he said, adding that she mentioned both Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. "She brought up both those names."

Mrs. Palin said she was speaking as "someone from Main Street U.S.A.," and she touched on her concerns about oversized federal bailouts and the unsustainable American government deficit. She did not repeat her attack from last month that the Obama administration's health care proposals would create a "death panel" that would allow federal bureaucrats to decide who is "worthy of health care."

Cameron Sinclair, another speaker at the event, said Mrs. Palin emphasized the need for a grassroots rebirth of the Republican Party driven by party leaders outside Washington.

A number of attendees thought Mrs. Palin, the former vice presidential candidate, was using the speech to begin to broaden her foreign policy credentials before making a run for the presidency in 2012.

"She's definitely a serious future presidential candidate, and I understand why she plays so well in middle America," said Mr. Coulter, a Canadian.

Mrs. Palin was faulted during the campaign last year for her lack of foreign policy experience and expertise. As the governor of Alaska, she said in her own defense, she had a unique insight because "you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska" -- a remark that was widely lampooned.

Accompanying Mrs. Palin to Hong Kong was Randy Scheunemann, the former foreign policy adviser to John McCain, who lost the 2008 election to President Obama.

Mrs. Palin did not take questions from the media after the speech, and there was a high degree of security and secrecy around the event. Only invited guests and a handful of employees from CLSA, the brokerage house that sponsored the event, were allowed inside the ballroom.

A CLSA spokeswoman declined to confirm a rumor that Mrs. Palin was paid $300,000 for her Hong Kong appearance.

When she resigned as governor in July, Mrs. Palin cited numerous reasons for stepping down, including more than $500,000 in legal fees that she and her husband, Todd, incurred because of 15 ethics complaints filed against her during her two and a half years in office.

Mr. Coulter said CLSA has a history of inviting keynote speakers who are "newsworthy and potentially controversial." Other previous speakers at the conference have included Al Gore, Alan Greenspan, Bono and Archbishop Desmond Tutu.

Mrs. Palin's speech took place at the Grand Hyatt on the Victoria Harbor waterfront and amid the soaring towers of corporate giants like AIG, HSBC and the Bank of China. Some attendees saw Hong Kong as an auspicious place for her first major international appearance.

Melvin Goodé, a regional marketing consultant, thought Mrs. Palin chose Hong Kong because, he said, it was "a place where things happen and where freedom can be expanded upon."

"It's not Beijing or Shanghai," said Mr. Goodé . "She also mentioned Tibet, Burma and North Korea in the same breath as places where China should be more sensitive and careful about how people are treated. She said it on a human-rights level."

Mr. Goodé, an African-American who said he did some campaign polling for President Obama, said Mrs. Palin mentioned President Obama three times on Wednesday.

"And there was nothing derogatory in it, no sleight of hand, and believe me, I was listening for that," he said, adding that Mrs. Palin referred to Mr. Obama as "our president," with the emphasis on "our."

Mr. Goodé, a New Yorker who said he would never vote for Mrs. Palin, said she acquitted herself well.

"They really prepared her well," he said. "She was articulate and she held her own. I give her credit. They've tried to categorize her as not being bright. She's bright."
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#9  GUAM PDN > seems SARAH has been critiqued as "WHOM DOES SHE THINK SHE IS - THE GOVERNOR OF GUAM"!

***cough*** ***cough **** .........

But, once again, I digress.....
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-09-23 19:31  

#8  JohnQC, it is quite clear that Obama intensely dislikes America as it is currently constituted. Perhaps the only state he despises more is Israel. His own words and deeds leave no doubt.
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2009-09-23 19:02  

#7  correction: I wonder if he and the people..
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-09-23 17:44  

#6  What's wrong with Washington is not a partisan issue. Unless the Republican Party fundamentally changes and stops trying to look like the Democratic Party we are going to get more of the same. B. Obama got elected because of what's wrong with Washington; not anything that's particularly wrong with the country. Unfortunately, many of the people who elected him went for the glitter and surrounding claptrap. They believed the soaring rhetoric of a Pied Piper. There was a lot of pre-election deceptiveness--empty promises, deceit, and yes [at the risk of being labeled a racist] lies too. The MSM looked the other way and really didn't do a service to America by providing honest to God reporting. They were too busy slamming George Bush about one thing or another or demonizing Sara Palin in the most petty of ways. They were pushing a leftist agenda. The voters were a little in attitude like the people who elected Carter after the Watergate debacle and Nixon's pardon by Ford. These voters were fed up with the corruptness of Washington and they elected a guy who didn't have a clue about the Presidency or leadership; someone who was different and new. And so now we are stuck in a similar situation. We have a guy who ran as a centrist but turns out to be the most leftist President we have ever had--a President who wants to change the very nature of America to one created in his image. BO has little use for capitalistic free markets. He wants to re-distribute the wealth in the country. I'm wonder if he and the peoplw who surround him even love [or like] America. He seems to be have a one-world view which favors some body like the UN over the USA. Despite all this the country will survive. It has survived a long time. Without a USA, the rest of the world would suffer. America has been a shining beacon for two centuries or so to many around the world. It will continue to be.
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-09-23 17:41  

#5  Teddy Roosevelt said: I grew into manhood thoroughly imbued with the feeling that a man must be respected for what he made of himself. But I had also, consciously or unconsciously, been taught that socially and industrially pretty much the whole duty of the man lay in thus making the best of himself; that he should be honest in his dealings with others and charitable in the old-fashioned way to the unfortunate; but that it was no part of his business to join with others in trying to make things better for the many by curbing the abnormal and excessive development of individualism in a few. Now I do not mean that this training was by any means all bad. On the contrary, the insistence upon individual responsibility was, and is, and always will be, a prime necessity.... But such teaching, if not corrected by other teaching, means acquiescence in a riot of lawless business individualism which would be quite as destructive to real civilization as the lawless military individualism of the Dark Ages.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2009-09-23 14:15  

#4   The Pig Men -- Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, AIG, et. al. -- had been and continue to be engaged in massive rent-seeking, control fraud, and gambling with other people's money. Laws & regulations already in place have been ignored. There are many factors in the current disaster. Yes, the federal government over-expanded credit. But that wasn't all. This is not a partisan issue, unless you get your jollies out of making it one.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2009-09-23 14:11  

#3  BP I'm afraid that you're over-simplifying. The Bankers in question (the big boys) were rent seeking their brains out trying to leverage the government into acting for their benefit.

The fact that so much of the gov't. was totally of the same mind made the result what you would expect of a Super Bowl where the Steelers offense was opposed by the Steelers defense. Who do you think would win?
Posted by: AlanC   2009-09-23 13:57  

#2  If even people here fall for that sad spin that "it's the bankers" that caused the credit crunch then it's sad.

Simply put.

There was FAR too much and regulators decide on the volume of credit in the economy, bankers allocate it.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-09-23 13:43  

#1   All Palin would have to do is make a plausible case for the prosecution and imprisonment of a few thousand banksters and she would have a tsunami of support. The mantle of Teddy Roosevelt and trust-busting is hanging on a coat hook in the party's waiting room.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2009-09-23 13:27  

00:00