You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
CIA Deploys More Spies to Afghanistan
2009-09-21
[Quqnoos] The US intelligence agency is sending teams of spies and paramilitary operatives to Afghanistan, Los Angeles Times reports.
Thank you for the publicity, LAT. Any notes on how we should recognize them?
Blond hair. Blue eyes. Yale pin.
The precise numbers are classified, but one US official has said the US Central Intelligence Agency already has nearly 700 employees in Afghanistan.
That's like a brigade or something, I think. More than the Pope has.
The surge of CIA agents parallels the US military expansion in the war-torn country as President Barack Obama has doubled the number of US troops in Afghanistan this year.

The incoming spies are receiving a broad range of assignments, including working in tandem with special forces units hunting high-value targets, tracking public sentiment in regions seen as shifting support toward the Taliban and gathering intelligence on corruption in the Afghan government, the Times said.
In other words, normal spy stuff. That's not really news.
The CIA push comes at a time that the Taliban-led insurgency has reached a record-level in Afghanistan and the movement conduct sophisticated attacks across the country, including the fortified Afghan capital, Kabul.

The agency's station is based at the US Embassy in Kabul, according to LA Times. But the bulk of the CIA's workforce is spread among a group of secret bases and military outposts that dot the country.
The country. Would that be Afghanistan, Pakistan, or Pashtunistan?
One of the largest concentrations of CIA personnel is at Bagram air base north of Kabul, which for years was the site of a secret agency prison, and the headquarters for U.S. military special operations forces.
One imagines it was Attorney General Holder's office that leaked this information, to reduce the need for prosecutions later. One hopes most sincerely one is wrong.
Posted by:Fred

#3  This would seem to make sense, to me.
Posted by: liberal hawk   2009-09-21 22:31  

#2  Wiretapping? Kind of difficult when everyone uses cell phones. Perhaps they meant electronic eavesdropping, and I hope we've been doing that from the beginning, Willy, just to know what we're ignoring.

Separately, it just occurred to me (clearly a slow thought day) that making the bad guys even more paranoid is not a bad thing, since they're already scanning the sky for Predators. Perhaps Mossad could share how they called all of Hizb'allah's cell phones at once...
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-09-21 18:01  

#1  The last phrase of the Los Angeles Times reports:

U.S. spy agencies have already stepped up their scrutiny of corruption in Kabul. The recent Senate report described a wiretapping system activated last year that is aimed at tracing ties between government officials and drug kingpins in the country.

Is that real?
Posted by: Willy   2009-09-21 13:50  

00:00