You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
A third of Karzai votes may be fraudulent, EU official says
2009-09-16
Washington - The Afghan elections, already tainted by widespread accusations of misconduct and fraud, received another body blow Wednesday when the head of the European Union's election-monitoring commission said that as many as 1.1 million votes cast in the vote were "suspect."

The latest dark cloud over the Aug. 20 election came as Afghanistan's election commission released a preliminary vote tally Wednesday showing President Hamid Karzai with 54.6 percent of the votes cast – enough to avoid a runoff if the total stands up to one official recount already launched and to mounting doubts like those from the EU.

The EU's general depiction of fraud was bad enough. But even more damaging to the Western-backed government of President Karzai was the finding by Phillippe Morillon, head of the EU monitor, that more than one-third of the votes Mr. Karzai received in his reelection bid – 1.1 million of about 3 million votes for Karzai – could be fraudulent and must be investigated.

In addition to the preliminary vote total, the election commission concluded that turnout in the election was 38 percent – much lower than the 70 percent that voted in Afghanistan's first presidential election in 2004 and a number that is likely to feed doubts about the government's legitimacy.

Reaction from the Karzai campaign organization to the EU's pronouncement was swift and hinted at a growing frustration with outside influences in Afghanistan. Antiforeign sentiment was inflamed earlier this year over rising civilian casualties from NATO military operations in the country, and now it has spiked again in recent weeks as Western governments and international NGOs have ratcheted up criticism of last month's election.

Calling the EU statement "irresponsible and in contradiction with Afghanistan's constitution," Karzai's supporters said in their own statement that any allegations of electoral impropriety are the sole domain of the Election Complaints Commission, a national body backed by the United Nations. That commission has already ordered a recount of about 10 percent of polling stations, a move that could put off for weeks a final announcement of the election's outcome.

The preliminary tally of election results showed Karzai with 54.6 percent of the vote, compared with 27.7 percent for his chief electoral rival, Abdullah Abdullah. The recount of polling stations, if limited to the 10 percent already announced, would have to deliver a massive shift away from Karzai to force the incumbent into a runoff.

The electoral turmoil is another sprung leak in the cracking dam that Afghanistan presents to President Obama.

As recently as last week, on the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Mr. Obama reminded Americans that the war in Afghanistan is necessary to deny the likes of Al Qaeda another safe haven and to ward off a Taliban takeover.

But critics of the war, including some conservatives, point to rampant corruption in the country – as observed, they say, in the recent elections – as one reason the eight-year-old US effort will never transform Afghanistan into a reliable partner in the global battle with extremism.

Increasingly, polls show that Americans who once supported the continued deployment of troops to Afghanistan are souring on the war.

That souring comes just as US commanders in Afghanistan are hinting that they will seek another boost in US forces in Afghanistan.

On Tuesday, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, told a congressional committee that the top American and NATO commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, would "probably" seek a further increase over the 68,000 troop level the American force is slated to reach in November.

Obama says he will seriously weigh the requests he receives from his commanders in Afghanistan, but the deepening political turmoil there will not make that deliberation any easier.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#9  We need to study what went right in Afghanistan between 1919 and 1979

Most Uzbecks and Tadjiks were under Soviet rule and the Pashtun had a free hand to run Afghanistan.

The likes of Dostum will never allow that to happen again.

The West percieves it needs Karzai to bring the Pushtun onboard and will let this obviously fraudulent election slide.
Posted by: phil_b   2009-09-16 22:06  

#8  You're assuming that we can do so without cost.

I don't really think we can succeed in more than some limited ways, within a budget we can afford. But I also think we're kidding ourselves if we don't realize the danger in a linkage of Iran, a Taliban-led Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Posted by: lotp   2009-09-16 21:28  

#7  What we do want is to fix this so that there is the possibility of Afghan identity that transcends local tribalism

And I want free medical care and icecream for every meal and the same waistline I had at 18 and Rita Hayworth in Gilda and...

What we need is to get real about what is possible in a portion of the world that is several centuries behind us in every aspect of development. We need to study what went right in Afghanistan between 1919 and 1979 and replicate as much of it as reasonable so that we can return to ignoring a useless, worthless corner of the world that deserves to be left alone.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2009-09-16 20:46  

#6  A couple observations from talking with people knowledgeable about the situation there:

a) we know Karzai's corrupt and weak

b) a big problem is that currently the regional governors are appointed, not elected. So people have no way to hold their officials accountable.

c) for reasons that are being explored, about 30% of the Afghan army leaves at the end of an enlistment period. This destroys continuity and unit effectiveness.

d) what we DON'T want is a strongman with a regional base again. What we do want is to fix this so that there is the possibility of Afghan identity that transcends local tribalism, because the alternative is that the Taliban provides a shared identity in the form of fanatical Islamicism / the Ummah.
Posted by: lotp   2009-09-16 20:04  

#5  Who elected the EU official?
Posted by: Matt   2009-09-16 19:32  

#4  It might be better just to let Dostum take care of business and keep some Special Forces guys around to call in bombs were required.

And he damn well can, even if it means dismounting, grabbing a few AK mags and leading a charge into Taliban trenches. Read Doug Stanton's book Horse Soldiers.

Posted by: Besoeker   2009-09-16 18:49  

#3  I disagree. Our soldiers have done immense good.

1) they removed al-Qaeda's ability to make war on us from Afghanistan.

2) they removed the Taliban from power.

3) they have made large sections of the north and west safe for the usual sorts of Afghans and tom-foolery, none of which threatens us.

That's not bad.

I'm not sure we need 40 or 70 or 100 thousand troops in Afghanistan. It might be better just to let Dostum take care of business and keep some Special Forces guys around to call in bombs were required. A smaller footprint would be easier to maintain.

Our goal isn't and shouldn't be nation-building. If the Afghans want a nation, let them fight for it. Our goal is to ensure the Taliban and al-Qaeda can't use that unhappy land to stage new attacks on us.
Posted by: Steve White   2009-09-16 18:37  

#2  No, I'll just say it. This is Rantburg.

I don't see how supporting the Karz. govt. is in the best interests of the United States.

I'm sure I'd love Afghans if I met many of them, but I don't see how losing one damn American life is worth this stack of tribal corruption and feuds.

We have the technology. To paraphrase "Aliens", we can 'nuke the site from orbit, just to be sure'.

Losing boots on the ground is just sick in this situation.

It's a waste of American lives for nothing, in which good intelligence and drones can accomplish the necessary mission.
Posted by: Mizzou Mafia   2009-09-16 18:10  

#1  1.1 MILLION???

(Blinks hard)

Yes, this is an endeavor we should continue. And even ramp up. This is worth it, people ...
Posted by: Mizzou Mafia   2009-09-16 18:03  

00:00