You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Interest in 'cash for clunkers' plan waning
2009-08-12
From the Sacramento Bee:
Consumer interest in the federal "cash for clunkers" car program is waning, according to Edmunds.com, the Santa Monica-based auto information site. Edmunds based its conclusion on decreased Internet traffic among consumers seeking car-buying information.

The clunkers program, which offers consumers credits of up to $4,500 for turning in old gas guzzlers for more fuel-efficient new cars, began July 27 and was so popular the Obama administration quickly sought additional funding.

However, Edmunds said Tuesday interest peaked July 29 and has since declined 15 percent. Edmunds' senior analyst Michelle Krebs said the original funding was "very low in relation to the size of the auto market," creating a "Gold Rush mentality where consumers hurried to take advantage."

The added funding has removed the sense of urgency and interest in the program is waning, Krebs said. Edmunds projected that car-purchase intent will be back to pre-"cash for clunkers" levels by Aug. 20.

Here's Edmunds' press release from last Aug. 6 (didn't see the one from yesterday this article refers to). My favorite line:
"And now, more than ever, it is important for car-buyers to do their research so that they pay a fair price for their new vehicles. . . . Our analysts have determined that dealers are enjoying a 20 percent increase in gross profit per sale involving a clunker trade-in since the program launched."
Emphasis added.
Posted by:Barbara Skolaut

#7  I looked into it, I discovered the dealers were hiking the prices about as much as the "Clunker" Money it's just helpimg dealerships, not people in need of a dependable ride.

No way in hell.I'll keep my old truck. (It gets 22 MPG anyway)
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-08-12 23:50  

#6  Time to gear up the "Cash for Cuckolds (and Cockqueans)"

You have an old tired unreliable spouse? Now get Obamadollars to trade him/her in for a newer more efficient model. Ask for the John Edwards-Mark Stanford Special deal. /sarc off
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-08-12 21:16  

#5  I still hope for a new Ford Transit Connect, if they ever arrive in local showrooms.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2009-08-12 18:24  

#4  Silly Richard - people don't matter (particularly the poor).

All that matters is the cognoscenti feel good about themselves.

*spit*
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-08-12 18:03  

#3  Having rebuilt quite a few engines, this almost makes me cry.

My biggest beef with this program would be that there are thousands of low-income folks who would be thrilled to get a decent vehicle to go to work in. What would have been the problem in taking the safe & operable 'gas guzzlers' in and re-selling them to these poor folks for say $1000-$1500 each? (SOME amount of ROI)

Oh wait, they wouldn't be taking the bus/light rail that goes no where near their place of employment (or potential employment) nor runs 24/7 when they actually could get second/third shift or weekend work.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2009-08-12 17:14  

#2  Whatever you think of the economics or industrial policy of it, the C4C requires that any car traded in have its engine deliberately destroyed.

Not dismantled for parts--destroyed.

What's the sense of destroying usable machinery so you can replace it with more expensive new machinery? That can't be good for the environment.
Posted by: Mike   2009-08-12 16:57  

#1  The milage determined for clunker cut off would grab millions of more cars if they raised it from 18/EPA (RED READJUSTED) MPH to 20.
18 really limits it.
Posted by: 3dc   2009-08-12 16:18  

00:00