You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Pentagon eyes accelerated "bunker buster" bomb
2009-08-03
* Bomb could be ready for B-2 bomber by July 2010
* Would deliver 10 times explosive power of predecessor

WASHINGTON, Aug 2 (Reuters) - The Pentagon is seeking to speed deployment of an ultra-large "bunker-buster" bomb on the most advanced U.S. bomber as soon as July 2010, the Air Force said on Sunday, amid concerns over perceived nuclear threats from North Korea and Iran.

The non-nuclear, 30,000-pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP, which is still being tested, is designed to destroy deeply buried bunkers beyond the reach of existing bombs.

If Congress agrees to shift enough funds to the program, Northrop Grumman Corp (NOC.N)'s radar-evading B-2 bomber "would be capable of carrying the bomb by July 2010," said Andy Bourland, an Air Force spokesman.

"The Air Force and Department of Defense are looking at the possibility of accelerating the program," he said. "There have been discussions with the four congressional committees with oversight responsibilities. No final decision has been made."

The precision-guided weapon, built by Boeing Co (BA.N), could become the biggest conventional bomb the United States has ever used.

Carrying more than 5,300 pounds of explosives. it would deliver more than 10 times the explosive power of its predecessor, the 2,000-pound BLU-109, according to the Pentagon's Defense Threat Reduction Agency, which has funded and managed the seed program.

Chicago-based Boeing, the Pentagon's No. 2 supplier by sales, could be put on contract within 72 hours to build the first MOP production models if Congress signs off, Bourland said.

The threat reduction agency is working with the Air Force to transition the program from "technology demonstration" to acquisition, said Betsy Freeman, an agency spokeswoman.

Both the U.S. Pacific Command, which takes the lead in U.S. military planning for North Korea, and the Central Command, which prepares for contingencies with Iran, appeared to be backing the acceleration request, said Kenneth Katzman, an expert on Iran at the Congressional Research Service, the research arm of Congress.

"It's very possible that the Pentagon wants to send a signal to various countries, particularly Iran and North Korea, that the United States is developing a viable military option against their nuclear programs," Katzman said.

But he cautioned against concluding there was any specific mission in mind at this time.

The MOP would be about one-third heavier than the 21,000-pound (9.5 million kg) GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb -- dubbed the "mother of all bombs" -- that was dropped twice in tests at a Florida range in 2003.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#17  TW - the Nov 2009 deadline is for a switch from engagement to sanctions. IE a return to the pre January 2009 glide path. That glide path had to move through a sanctions/coalition building phase before military action.

True, liberal hawk. But from Israel's perspective, to interrupt engagement with violence against the engagee risks rupture with the US in a way that interrupting the glidepath does not. I don't think PM Netanyahu is likely to wait until next July -- or that indeterminate later time when President Obama or his successor decides to sell them to Israel -- to deal with Iran's little nuclear device production problem.
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-08-03 23:04  

#16  LH:

Your first post suggested this announcement was directed toward Israel. Now you argue it is directed toward Iran. Fine. I'll play along.

If this is directed to Iran, it is weak tea indeed. You don't fear the gun. You fear the man holding it, and Iran has nothing to fear from this administration. The world press has already picked up on Bammo's foreign policy weakness. It's no secret. No one could believe for an instant that a pretty new bomb would suddenly cause Bammo to grow a pair.

Further to this point, an attack by Israel may be enhanced by a better bunker buster, as they would only get one shot at hitting all their targets. An attack by the US would be from closer range, employ significantly more assets and be more sustained. Buried nuclear assets could be targeted in many ways likely to produce better results and which do not require this weapon. It is not a game changer, as Iran no doubt understands.
Posted by: Iblis   2009-08-03 17:45  

#15  LiberalHawk..
I know it's not PC to say so... but we do have stuff in our bag of tricks that does a lot more than this conventional bomb....
This is a PC answer of sorts.
Posted by: 3dc   2009-08-03 17:19  

#14  TW - the Nov 2009 deadline is for a switch from engagement to sanctions. IE a return to the pre January 2009 glide path. That glide path had to move through a sanctions/coalition building phase before military action.

and this administration will never bomb Iran

I cant say whether that is true or not. The point is though, if you are Khameni, are you willing to base a position on the idea that there is a Zero chance of that attack happening. Certainly one of the more prominent rationales presented for NOT attacking has been the technical infeasibility. To announce this new bomb, and its expected data, cant be reassuring in Teheran.
Posted by: liberal hawk   2009-08-03 16:34  

#13  3dc, the most recent message to Israel -- and Iran -- was that America's deadline for Iran to discontinue working toward a nuclear weapon is November, 2009. So the July, 2010 deadline is an eight-month move in the wrong direction, as far as Israel's needs are concerned.
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-08-03 16:28  

#12  #7

Did you not read the first sentence of the posted item?
Posted by: liberal hawk   2009-08-03 15:24  

#11  Israel does not have any B-2's, and this administration will never bomb Iran. No point waiting, and this bomb would not be required to do it.
Posted by: Iblis   2009-08-03 14:47  

#10  Chicago-based Boeing, the Pentagon's No. 2 supplier by sales,...

I guess it's a go, then, assuming campaign contribution cheques clear.
Posted by: Skunky Glins 5***   2009-08-03 14:37  

#9  So first drop MOAB to clear the surface, then the Bunker Buster to blow up those underground? Or vice versa?
Posted by: Lagom   2009-08-03 13:31  

#8  about that time thingy...
Posted by: 3dc   2009-08-03 13:24  

#7  OKAY LibHawk - What's so special about July 2010?
all midterm primary elections done?
Posted by: 3dc   2009-08-03 13:20  

#6  "Both the U.S. Pacific Command, which takes the lead in U.S. military planning for North Korea, and the Central Command, which prepares for contingencies with Iran, appeared to be backing the acceleration request, said Kenneth Katzman, an expert on Iran at the Congressional Research Service, the research arm of Congress"

this could also be a message to Israel, about the importance of patience, at least till July 2010
Posted by: liberal hawk   2009-08-03 12:50  

#5  Heavy. 21,000-pound (9.5 million kg)

(9.5 million kg = 20'900'000 lbs)
Posted by: Willy   2009-08-03 11:33  

#4  
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2009-08-03 09:36  

#3  Bomb could be ready for B-2 bomber by July 2010

...IF the B-2 is still there. You'd be surprised how fast a plane can be decommissioned....

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2009-08-03 09:03  

#2  The WW" Grand Slam is bigger than the MOAB.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Slam_bomb
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-08-03 07:59  

#1  BIGGEST BOMB

I thought that was Ishtar with Warren Beatty.
Posted by: GORT   2009-08-03 07:20  

00:00