You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Afghanistan
US won't stop deadly blitz in Afghanistan
2009-08-03
The newly appointed commander of US-led troops in Afghanistan says he does not plan to halt controversial air strikes which have killed many camp followers civilians in the war-torn country. Gen Stanley McChrystal emphasized the air strikes were necessary to protect troops taking part in ground operations across Afghanistan.

"It's very hard because it's a balance for the young soldier on the ground, who is in combat. One of the assets that he has that might save his life might be air power or indirect fire from artillery or mortars and we don't want to take away that protection for him," the BBC quoted McChrystal as saying.

Camp followers Civilians have been the main victims of violence in Afghanistan particularly in the troubled southern and eastern provinces where the main fighting is going on.

The spiraling civilian casualties amongst camp followers inflicted by US-led forces in Afghanistan have sparked outrage among Afghans and constitute a moot point between Kabul and Washington.

The top US commander added that he plans to reduce Afghan camp followers civilians' death but not on expense of troops' lives. He said both "preventing and investigating" camp followers civilian causalities would be Washington's priority in the conflict-torn country.

The remarks comes a day after a UN report suggested that air strikes by the US-led forces and insurgent bombings were responsible for a higher number of camp followers civilian causalities in the war-torn country. UN assistance mission in Afghanistan warned on Friday that the number of Afghan camp followers civilians killed either in US-led airstrikes or Taliban attacks had risen beyond the 1000 mark in the first half of 2009.

The development comes as a Saturday air-strike in southern Afghanistan reportedly killed five camp followers civilians and wounded ten. Reports said missiles were fired at a weapons depot residential area in a small town in Helmand province.

The UN has warned that an increase in the number of American troops in Afghanistan could mean a greater loss of camp followers life in the war-torn country.
Posted by:Fred

#2  The UN has warned that an increase in the number of American troops in Afghanistan could mean a greater loss of life in the war-torn country.

Happened in Italy '43-'45, France '44-'45, the Low Countries '44-'45, and Germany '44-'45. The UN [or it's precursor] didn't object then.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-08-03 08:31  

#1  The UN figured out that more troops leads to more violence?

What's next?
Posted by: Bobby   2009-08-03 06:34  

00:00