You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
F-35 Falls Behind Two More Years, Report Says
2009-07-24
An internal Pentagon oversight board has reported that the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program is two years behind schedule, according to multiple congressional aides familiar with the findings.

Talk of the program's problems comes amid intense debate over the future of another fighter plane, the F-22. Defenders of the F-22 argue that continued production is vital to national security. The White House and some lawmakers who favor halting the production of any new F-22 warplanes say the F-35 will fill the gap and meet the nation's combat aircraft needs.

Senators and aides are now lamenting that the Pentagon oversight panel's more pessimistic view on the F-35 program was not publicly released during the F-22 debate. They are calling for more open disclosure of the problems with the development of the F-35.

The Pentagon's Joint Estimate Team (JET), which was established to independently evaluate the F-35 program, is at odds with the Joint Program Office, which runs the F-35 program, the aides said. The oversight panel's calculations determined that the fighter won't be able to move out of the development phase and into full production until 2016, rather than 2014 as the program office has said. That's assuming there are no further problems with the program, which has already faced cost overruns and schedule delays. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) said the delay could cost as much as $7.4 billion. The discrepancy between the Joint Estimate Team and the Joint Program Office was noted in a March report by the GAO, but it received little attention at the time.

"In every parameter and in every respect, the Joint Program Office's projections were always a hell of a lot rosier than what the Joint Estimate Team found," said one Senate aide who was briefed on the findings.
Posted by:Steve White

#6  Whaddaya mean "unless," Al? >:-(
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-07-24 12:37  

#5  We gave up more F-22s for this?

Unless Zero is actually trying to destroy the US this doesn't make any sense.
Posted by: Frozen Al   2009-07-24 11:53  

#4  ...Not good at all. The F-15 and F-16 fleet may be sufficient to hold on for a while yet until the first unmanned dogfighters get into service (probably around 2020) but they have suffered from increasing structural problems for some time. And if they start falling out of the sky during the Obama Administration, I fear the response will be to simply deactivate units.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2009-07-24 05:24  

#3  I question the timing of the sacking of the top AF brass that, not long ago, objected strenuously to the Administration's plan to can the F-22.
Posted by: AzCat   2009-07-24 02:44  

#2  I question the timing. Releasing the report right AFTER the F-22 was shot down?
Posted by: crosspatch   2009-07-24 01:29  

#1  OK, class repeat after me: "technological risk"

Lots of eggs - one basket?

Gates has never inspired much confidence. His bosses (and deputies) ..... yikes.

Not hard to imagine a US in the medium future lacking sufficient tactical air power and surface combatants to cover its basic commitments.
Posted by: Verlaine   2009-07-24 01:27  

00:00