| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| CIA Plan Envisioned Hit Teams Killing al Qaeda Leaders |
| 2009-07-14 |
| Follow-up from yesterday. WASHINGTON — A secret Central Intelligence Agency initiative axed by Director Leon Panetta examined how to assassinate members of al Qaeda with hit teams on the ground, according to current and former national-security officials familiar with the matter. The goal was to assemble teams of CIA and special-operations forces "and put bullets in [the al Qaeda leaders'] heads," one former intelligence official said. OK, can I see a show of hands, who thinks this is a fine idea? The plan was never carried out, and Mr. Panetta canceled the effort on the day he learned of it, June 23. Even though it's precisely the sort of thing we created the CIA to do ... The next day, he alerted Congress, which didn't know about the plan. "The agency hasn't discussed publicly the nature of the effort, which remains classified," said agency spokesman Paul Gimigliano. The Wall Street Journal reported Monday the effort stemmed from a presidential order dated September 2001 that directed the CIA to find ways to kill or capture al Qaeda leaders. The revelation has intensified a growing battle between the executive branch and Congress over the conduct of the CIA and U.S. intelligence operations. Democrats in Congress are calling for an investigation into whether it was properly briefed on the matter. Meanwhile, Sen. Kit Bond, the top Republican on the Senate intelligence panel, said the thrust of the plan should be resurrected. "The general concept in the plan is one that should be explored somewhere. Whether it's a modification of this plan or some related plan," he said in an interview. A man who knows a weak spot when he sees it Congress frequently feuded with the Bush administration over intelligence matters. Democrats expected that tension would abate under the Obama administration, but lawmakers have frequently found themselves at odds with President Barack Obama's decisions to continue or not investigate controversial intelligence policies initiated under President George W. Bush. The tug-of-war will enter a new round as soon as this week, when the House is expected to take up a bill that would expand congressional oversight of intelligence activities, especially of covert-action programs. The White House has said it would veto the bill if passed. Had it become fully developed, the CIA's aborted plan would have been a covert-action program. At the outset, the potential operation wouldn't have been limited to particular countries. There's the spot that made the CIA uneasy. Wacking Al-Q in Afghanistan or Pakistain is one thing. Downtown Rome or London another. Which means we're not allowed to credit the CIA with having enough sense to refrain from Rome and London ... The use of hit teams was in accordance with the authority granted by the 2001 order, said a former national-security official familiar with it. In the most recent iteration of the project, top CIA leaders instructed officers involved to narrow its focus and report the plans to Congress if they reached a critical point, according to a former senior intelligence official. Targeted killing of terrorists is prohibited by a longstanding presidential order banning assassinations that dates back to the Ford administration, noted Vicki Divoll, a former CIA counsel. But the president can waive that order, she said, because there is no specific law that bans the practice. There's also no legal difference, she said, between killing al Qaeda targets with a hit team or with an unmanned drone, because the "intent to kill a targeted person" defines an assassination. Yes, it does. Funny how the press tries to overlook that. It's why the Phoenix program raised such violent hackles while air strikes were defined as 'surgical' ... The CIA has recently opted to step up its use of Predator and Reaper drones to kill al Qaeda and related militants in Pakistan's tribal areas. That program is done in consultation with Pakistani officials and is less risky than sending in individuals, because it doesn't involve U.S. personnel on the ground. So I guess it's okay for a Predator to smoke them with a missile but ya can't sneak up behind them and put two in the turban if you get a chance? That makes sense... One official with direct knowledge of the secret program said that assassination teams could be more effective than taking out al Qaeda leaders with drone-fired missiles. "We're talking about the difference between two feet and 50,000 feet," said one official with direct knowledge of the program. "Do you want the collateral damage of 50,000 feet or two?" Mr. Panetta's decision to kill the assassination initiative has put him in a tough spot. His recent moves to stand up for the agency in disputes with the director of national intelligence and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — who recently accused the agency of "lying all the time" — have bolstered his support within the agency, veterans said. But lawmakers' rapid-fire calls to investigate Bush-era efforts like the secret assassination program threaten to undermine that support. The flap with Congress over the secret program is already reverberating through the CIA's Langley, Va., headquarters, said one former senior intelligence official who is in regular contact with former colleagues. "They've expressed concern that nobody's got their back," the former official said. Oh, they've got your back, it's just that they're contemplating where to put the knife. |
| Posted by:Steve |
| #14 If I didn't already believe congressional dems to be a bunch of self-serving sanctimonious preening egotistical self-righteous anti-American douchebags I might actually get pissed about this. |
| Posted by: Broadhead6 2009-07-14 23:36 |
| #13 "Envisions", huh? Well, I hope they properly filed out form 3687q/6 "Envisioning Report" of their daydreams and sent them off to Congress... Oh, and by the by - I got another captcha error due to a single-quote in a pic description. Needs work, guys. |
| Posted by: mojo 2009-07-14 20:05 |
| #12 A stoned executive is the fastest path to small government (except the catering budget). |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2009-07-14 18:27 |
| #11 Glenmore. Hmm, yes, marijuana brownies could create |
| Posted by: GirlThursday 2009-07-14 12:51 |
| #10 Girl Thursday, IF "all they are able to do is dawdle, dissemble, talk, and eat" we'd be WAY ahead, so let's secretly serve top-grade hash brownies in the Capitol cafeteria. |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2009-07-14 12:32 |
| #9 Are members of Congress drug tested? Are any members of Congress coming to work stoned on medical grade marijuana? Because these f-ers sure seem like all they are able to do is dawdle, dissemble, talk, and eat, just like your typical stoner. |
| Posted by: GirlThursday 2009-07-14 11:19 |
| #8 Whats really needed is to ensure ABSOLUTELY that the intell committees arent leaky. You aren't serious are you, hawk? |
| Posted by: tu3031 2009-07-14 10:49 |
| #7 CIA wanted to be able to take folks out in places like Rome and London. Didnt want to tell congress, cause if that leaked, Euros would be pissed as all hell. So they didnt tell, and now congress is pissed. But Congress is supposed to know about something as big and risky as this. Dilemma either way, IMO. Whats really needed is to ensure ABSOLUTELY that the intell committees arent leaky. |
| Posted by: liberal hawk 2009-07-14 10:46 |
| #6 NPR? Duly noted. You can probably throw the Post and The Boston Globe in there too. |
| Posted by: tu3031 2009-07-14 10:44 |
| #5 I'm pretty sure that teams of hitmen was more the OSS's kind of thing. The CIA was supposed to be less cowboy than that, more Organization Man. And tu3031? I'm pretty sure that NPR's pissed about this too, given the earful I got from the weekend prunes on Saturday. In between the odes to the Bronx and Daniel Schorr's senile prattle, that is... |
| Posted by: Mitch H. 2009-07-14 10:16 |
| #4 No targeted killings,the furor over collateral damage from drones, closing Gitmo, defense budget cuts, geeeez!!!!!That I pay for their salaries and generous perks infuriates me. Maybe we should outsource their jobs, along with CIA's? |
| Posted by: Lumpy Elmoluck5091 2009-07-14 09:44 |
| #3 Which means we're not allowed to credit the CIA with having enough sense to refrain from Rome and London ... No, the AQ that would get whacked in Rome would've been whacked by disgruntled Mafia upset at competition in the rackets, and those whacked in London would have been whacked by other wacky Muslims upset at the rape of their teenaged sons. Etc. |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2009-07-14 07:37 |
| #2 Should not the real story here be that most of the people in middle American think the CIA has been killing Al Qaeda, want them to kill Al Qaeda, and if they believe the story will be angry that the CIA has not been killing Al Qaeda up close and personal? |
| Posted by: Donald McConnell 2009-07-14 02:37 |
| #1 I think the only people that are pissed off about this are idiot congressional Democrats and the New York Times. |
| Posted by: tu3031 2009-07-14 00:14 |