| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| It sure seems like Obama has an ideological problem with democracy |
| 2009-07-09 |
| Jonah Goldberg The Obama Doctrine is finally coming into focus....Obama himself insists that he’s guided by nothing other than a cool-headed pragmatism. Indeed, Obama has a grating habit of describing any position not his own as “ideological,” as if his is the only sober, practical understanding of the problems we face. Just days before he was inaugurated, he gave a speech in Baltimore in which he proclaimed, “What is required is a new declaration of independence, not just in our nation, but in our own lives — from ideology and small thinking, prejudice and bigotry — an appeal not to our easy instincts but to our better angels.” So ideologues — i.e. millions of Americans who disagree with his policies on principle — belong in a list along with bigots and dim bulbs. At home, this attitude has allowed him to dismiss opponents of socialized medicine and the government takeover of various industries as “ideologues,” and critics of trillions in debt-fueled spending as small-minded cranks. Joshua Muravchik, a scholar at Johns Hopkins University and a leading advocate of democracy promotion around the globe, demonstrates in the current issue of Commentary that Obama has a similar attitude toward those who say America should advance the cause of liberty and democracy worldwide. Again and again, the administration has made it clear that spreading freedom is so much ideological foolishness.... The past four weeks show how ideological Obama’s un-ideological view really is. In response to the revolutionary protests in Iran, Obama initially favored stability and preserving the fantasy of negotiations with the Iranian clerical junta. Not “meddling” was his top priority. Over time, the rhetoric improved, but the policy remained just as cynical. Then, events in Honduras revealed that Obama really has no problem with meddling when a left-wing agenda is advanced. Manuel Zelaya, the president of Honduras and a Hugo Chávez wannabe, illegally defied the Honduran Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Constitution in an attempt to repeal term limits (which help sustain democracy in Central America by preventing presidents-for-life). The Supreme Court ordered the military to remove Zelaya from office and expel him from the country. A member of Zelaya’s own party replaced him, and elections were announced. But suddenly, Obama — taking much the same position as Fidel Castro and Hugo Chávez — thought America should join the coalition of the meddlers demanding Zelaya’s return to power. In Iran, Obama was terrified to do anything that might lead to a coup to bring about democracy. In Honduras, Obama was unwilling to let stand a coup that preserved democracy. It sure seems like Obama has an ideological problem with democracy. |
| Posted by:Mike |
| #3 Can you imagine a Declaration of Independence written by Obama. Shudder!! 'Declaration of Dependence upon Government' would be a better title. |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2009-07-09 19:27 |
| #2 "What is required is a new declaration of independence, not just in our nation, but in our own lives -- from ideology and small thinking, prejudice and bigotry -- an appeal not to our easy instincts but to our better angels."? What's wrong with the old Declaration of Independence? It has served our country well from its inception. It served well until many politicians, lawyers, and others quit adhering to it--and they replaced it with "political correctness" and other such nonsense. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2009-07-09 17:35 |
| #1 And many Christian dhimmis view islam as nothing but a variant faith. They project their own tolerance onto inherently aggressive muslims. |
| Posted by: Black Bart Phaviting8990 2009-07-09 14:04 |