You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Al Gore likens fight against Global Warming climate change to battle with Nazis
2009-07-07
Al Gore today compared the battle against Global Warming climate change with the struggle against the Nazis.

The former US Vice President said the world lacked the political will to act and invoked the spirit of Winston Churchill by encouraging leaders to unite their nations to fight climate change. He also accused politicians around the world of exploiting ignorance about the dangers of global warming to avoid difficult decisions.

Speaking in Oxford at the Smith School World Forum on Enterprise and the Environment, sponsored by The Times, Mr Gore said: "Winston Churchill aroused this nation in heroic fashion to save civilisation in World War II."
He could ask for the Churchill bust his dear friend President Obama returned not long ago.
He added: "We have everything we need except political will but political will is a renewable resource."

Mr Gore admitted that it was difficult to persuade the public that the threat from climate change was as urgent as the threat from Nazi Germany.
That's 'cause it isn't as urgent. Of course, climate change isn't a threat either, but rather a promise, and one we can do absolutely nothing to affect on a global level. Locally, small changes can be made by replanting forests -- perhaps Mr Gore should suggest to his English listeners that they give up their lovely village cottages for flats in the city, and replant the vasty woodlands the Robin Hood tales made famous.
"The level of awareness and concern among populations has not crossed the threshold where political leaders feel that they must change.

"The only way politicians will act is if awareness raises to a level to make them feel that it's a necessity."

Mr Gore, who brought the issues around climate change to a mass audience with the 2006 documentary An Inconvenient Lie Truth, said the great hope for the future lay in a high level of environmental awareness among young people. He said sceptics who refused to believe dramatic cuts in carbon emissions could be delivered
(plant more trees!)
Mean global temperature has dropped since he showed that movie. Perhaps he should make another movie.
should consider the example of the young scientists in the NASA team which put a man on the moon on 1969. "The average age of scientists in the space centre control room was 26, which means they were 18 when they heard President Kennedy say he wanted to put a man on the moon in 10 years. Neil Armstrong did it eight years and two months later."

He said future generations would put one of two questions to today's adults. "It will either be 'what were you thinking, didn't you see the North Pole freezing melting before your eyes, didn't you hear what the scientists were saying?' Or they will ask 'how is it you were so stupid to believe Al Gore able to find the moral courage to solve the crisis which so many said couldn't be solved?'."
Gosh, why would so many say such a thing?
Sir David King, the Government's former chief scientist and now director of the Smith School, also berated politicians for failing to follow up their statements on climate change with a clear programme of action. "I do think it's relatively easy for a prime minister to make a speech on climate change which sounds committed and very much more difficult for that prime minister to persuade the Treasury to put the finance behind that commitment to make it a reality.

"There is a long distance in government between saying what you think needs to be said and then doing in terms of taxing people to death making budgets available."
Indeed. That's because the politicians are the ones who have to face the voters who actually pay for your pie-in-the-sky projects, Sir David.
Sir David expressed disappointment that no senior British politician had taken up his invitation to address a conference attended by the world's top climate scientists, senior business leaders and the presidents of the Maldives and Rwanda.
The Maldives and Rwanda are the vanguard of enlightenment regarding Global Warming?
Since they've refused to think about more important issues, they can devote themselves to such trivialities.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#10  I dunno, newc. At least Mussolini made the trains run on time, which is more than the Gorebot can do.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-07-07 21:50  

#9  Gore, you are an utterably complete self serving imbicile.

I liken you with mousillini.
Posted by: newc   2009-07-07 21:49  

#8  Al Gore is a bigger idiot than I ever gave him credit for.
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-07-07 20:06  

#7  Environment Agency sets up green police

The Green Shirts.
Posted by: ed   2009-07-07 15:57  

#6  Winston Churchill refused to make peace with Germany after the fall of France, when the war had clearly been lost and there was no further reason to continue it. But Churchill refused to accept anything but Victory. "We shall never surrender" what kind of peacenik would support a stance like that? I'd be careful about liberals quoting Churchill, it's a dangerous precedent to set.
Posted by: gromky   2009-07-07 15:21  

#5  he's just a bit confused about which side of the debate is the totalitarian fascist one.
You got it in one Mike,
Environment Agency sets up green police
Posted by: tipper   2009-07-07 14:31  

#4  DATE: August 1, 2005

GLOBAL WARMING INITIATIVE A MAJOR OPPORTUNITY
FOR CALIFORNIA'S ECONOMY


Jobs. A study by Redefining Progress found that, if properly implemented, the governor’s recommendations and/or AB 32 could create as many as 200,000 jobs in California—enough to lower the state unemployment rate by 15 percent. This is more than twice the estimate—based on only a partial implementation—produced by the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA).

Savings. When fully implemented, these initiatives could provide the average California household with net savings greater than $750 per year, the equivalent of a 20 percent cut in the state income tax. Properly directed, these savings would be especially beneficial in assisting low- and moderate-income families, communities and small businesses overcome financial barriers to energy efficiency.



HaHahaaaaaa!

Science Puts the Chill to California's Global Warming Hot Air


Exhaustive research of climatological data going back millions of years carried out by Lee Gerhard, senior scientist with the Kansas Geological Society, reveals an entirely different picture of the forces driving the myriad changes through which the earth's climate has passed. Gerhard dismisses the notion that human emissions of carbon dioxide are a significant driver of climate and refutes the idea that climate change rates and today's slight global warming are unprecedented. "They are not," he flatly states. Instead, Gerhard makes two key points:

* Climate naturally changes constantly, from warmer to cooler and from cooler to warmer, and at many levels of intensity over time at many scales.

* Variation in solar activity closely correlates with global temperature variations, suggesting that the amount of solar energy reaching the surface of the earth is a primary climate driver at the time scale of decades to millennia.3

"Overall," Gerhard says, "the earth's climate has been cooling for 60 million years, but that is only an average -- temperature goes up and down constantly."4 Addressing a September 20 Capitol Hill briefing sponsored by the Center for Science and Public Policy, Gerhard, in a power point presentation, showed the highly variable nature of the earth's climate over the past 16,000 years and, in more detail, during the last 2,000 years. "Depending on the period in earth's history that is chosen," he said, "the climate will either be warming or cooling. Choosing whether earth is warming or cooling is simply a matter of picking end points."5

Gerhard, whose research took place under the auspices of the Kansas Geological Survey and was not funded by industry, points out that the geological record shows that rises in greenhouse gases do not precede rises in temperature. Indeed, CO2 levels actually rose prior to the advent of the Little Ice Age (circa 1400).6 Moreover, CO2, the greenhouse gas most prominently cited as contributing to global warming, represents only about 1/4 of 1 percent of the total greenhouse gas effect, "hardly a device to drive the massive energy system of earth's climate," he says.

Gerhard's conclusions are supported by findings released Sept. 29 by CO2 researechers Sherwood, Keith and Craig Idso. "[E]arth's mean near-surface air temperature is nowhere near the peak level of what it was a million or so years ago," they write. "Neither is it as high as it was during the mid-Holocene [circe 5,000 years ago], which was itself much cooler than all four of the interglacials that preceded it. In fact, it's not even as warm now as it was a mere 900 years ago, when the atmosphere's CO2 concentration was fully 100 ppm (parts per million) less than it is today..."
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2009-07-07 14:06  

#3  He's right about the parallel to the struggle against totalitarian fascism; he's just a bit confused about which side of the debate is the totalitarian fascist one.
Posted by: Mike   2009-07-07 13:32  

#2  Damn, I just posted this with comments. I'll have to try to remember them.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2009-07-07 13:01  

#1  Mr Gore admitted that it was difficult to persuade the public that the threat from climate change was as urgent as the threat from Nazi Germany.

Hmmmmmmm. Why do you think that is, Al? Maybe people aren't as stupid as you think, perhaps?
Posted by: tu3031   2009-07-07 12:56  

00:00