You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caribbean-Latin America
Honduras defends Its democracy
2009-06-29
Fidel Castro and Hillary Clinton object.

Hugo Chávez's coalition-building efforts suffered a setback yesterday when the Honduran military sent its president packing for abusing the nation's constitution. It seems that President Mel Zelaya miscalculated when he tried to emulate the success of his good friend Hugo in reshaping the Honduran Constitution to his liking. But Honduras is not out of the Venezuelan woods yet. Yesterday the Central American country was being pressured to restore the authoritarian Mr. Zelaya by the likes of Fidel Castro, Daniel Ortega, Hillary Clinton and, of course, Hugo himself. The Organization of American States, having ignored Mr. Zelaya's abuses, also wants him back in power. It will be a miracle if Honduran patriots can hold their ground.

That Mr. Zelaya acted as if he were above the law, there is no doubt. While Honduran law allows for a constitutional rewrite, the power to open that door does not lie with the president. A constituent assembly can only be called through a national referendum approved by its Congress. But Mr. Zelaya declared the vote on his own and had Mr. Chávez ship him the necessary ballots from Venezuela. The Supreme Court ruled his referendum unconstitutional, and it instructed the military not to carry out the logistics of the vote as it normally would do. The top military commander, Gen. Romeo Vásquez Velásquez, told the president that he would have to comply. Mr. Zelaya promptly fired him. The Supreme Court ordered him reinstated. Mr. Zelaya refused.

Calculating that some critical mass of Hondurans would take his side, the president decided he would run the referendum himself. So on Thursday he led a mob that broke into the military installation where the ballots from Venezuela were being stored and then had his supporters distribute them in defiance of the Supreme Court's order. The attorney general had already made clear that the referendum was illegal, and he further announced that he would prosecute anyone involved in carrying it out. Yesterday, Mr. Zelaya was arrested by the military and is now in exile in Costa Rica.

It remains to be seen what Mr. Zelaya's next move will be. It's not surprising that chavistas throughout the region are claiming that he was victim of a military coup. They want to hide the fact that the military was acting on a court order to defend the rule of law and the constitution, and that the Congress asserted itself for that purpose, too. Mrs. Clinton has piled on as well. Yesterday she accused Honduras of violating "the precepts of the Interamerican Democratic Charter" and said it "should be condemned by all." Fidel Castro did just that. Mr. Chávez pledged to overthrow the new government.

Honduras is fighting back by strictly following the constitution. The Honduran Congress met in emergency session yesterday and designated its president as the interim executive as stipulated in Honduran law. It also said that presidential elections set for November will go forward. The Supreme Court later said that the military acted on its orders. It also said that when Mr. Zelaya realized that he was going to be prosecuted for his illegal behavior, he agreed to an offer to resign in exchange for safe passage out of the country. Mr. Zelaya denies it.

Many Hondurans are going to be celebrating Mr. Zelaya's foreign excursion. Street protests against his heavy-handed tactics had already begun last week. On Friday a large number of military reservists took their turn. "We won't go backwards," one sign said. "We want to live in peace, freedom and development." Besides opposition from the Congress, the Supreme Court, the electoral tribunal and the attorney general, the president had also become persona non grata with the Catholic Church and numerous evangelical church leaders. On Thursday evening his own party in Congress sponsored a resolution to investigate whether he is mentally unfit to remain in office.

For Hondurans who still remember military dictatorship, Mr. Zelaya also has another strike against him: He keeps rotten company. Earlier this month he hosted an OAS general assembly and led the effort, along side OAS Secretary General José Miguel Insulza, to bring Cuba back into the supposedly democratic organization. The OAS response is no surprise. Former Argentine Ambassador to the U.N. Emilio Cárdenas told me on Saturday that he was concerned that "the OAS under Insulza has not taken seriously the so-called 'democratic charter.' It seems to believe that only military 'coups' can challenge democracy. The truth is that democracy can be challenged from within, as the experiences of Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua, and now Honduras, prove." A less-kind interpretation of Mr. Insulza's judgment is that he doesn't mind the Chávez-style coup.

The struggle against chavismo has never been about left-right politics. It is about defending the independence of institutions that keep presidents from becoming dictators. This crisis clearly delineates the problem. In failing to come to the aid of checks and balances, Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Insulza expose their true colors.
Posted by:ryuge

#16  Monicas dress sold for a bundle.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2009-06-29 17:37  

#15  Is there any thing the Clintons cannot make worse?
Posted by: whatadeal   2009-06-29 15:50  

#14  I'll try to make it simple: If the President breaks the law, Congress and the Supreme Court can order him to obey the law in a number of ways. If he still refuses, and attempts, for example, to use force against an impeachment and removal proceeding, the legal obligation devolves down the chain of command until someone will obey. At some point, whoever can enforce the law is legally required to do so.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2009-06-29 14:16  

#13  This isn't the fucking Third Reich, there is no Hitler style oath of loyalty to the POTUS unto death.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2009-06-29 14:05  

#12  Jack, I understand that the military is part of the executive. Nevertheless, its primary oath is to the Constitution and that supercedes any other arrangement or chain of command. Are you saying otherwise, that it is somehow unlawful for the military to assist the Congress or the courts in restoring Constitutional order?
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2009-06-29 14:03  

#11  AP limited their discussion of past coups to Central America. Otherwise they probably would have mentioned the Bush coup of 2000 as the last one. That was executed not by the military but by something libs and the media hate even more, a duly constituted and ethical court of law.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2009-06-29 13:59  

#10  The military is part of the Executive branch of government. Not the judiciary and not the legislative. Its leader is the President not the Chief Justice. But that aside, there is always the possibility of a "7 Days in May" type of putsch but Barry would have to be in the soup big time, not just for increasing the deficit and strangling capitalism. I fear we are going to lose our post-Iraq and post-Afghanistan officer corp and Barry gets to mold the heart of the military to his own liking. That is a greater fear than an actual military coup over the One.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2009-06-29 13:56  

#9  I believe the federal courts can also order the military into action in the event of an insurrection, which open defiance by Obama and ACORN the executive certainly would be.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2009-06-29 13:42  

#8  "Honduras makes me wonder if anything like this would even happen in the USA, the military moving against the executive branch to block a move outlawed by the courts &/or legislature."

Normally, federal marshals (who work for the judicial branch) would have the job of dealing with illegal acts by the executive branch. If they cannot handle it, the Congress can in fact declare a state of insurrection and call upon the military to enforce the Constitution. This is almost exactly what happened in Honduras. The "coup" and "military power grab" as the traitors at AP call it, was no such thing.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2009-06-29 13:39  

#7  I'd like to voice my full support for someone moving to enforce the constitution here in the US.
Posted by: Iblis   2009-06-29 12:42  

#6   Honduras makes me wonder if anything like this would even happen in the USA, the military moving against the executive branch to block a move outlawed by the courts &/or legislature.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2009-06-29 12:35  

#5  This is an outrage, an utter disgrace; the United States joining various tinhorns in an effort to overthrow the rule of law and place yet another country under the heel of authoritarian "community organizers."
Is this the Big Zero's plan for the United States, too; staged and orchestrated "popular" sentiment and the charisma of the dear leader trumping the Constitution and the rule of law?

Screw these traitors, screw the media and to hell with Chavez, Castro, and ACORN.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2009-06-29 10:42  

#4  For Hondurans who still remember military dictatorship, Mr. Zelaya also has another strike against him: He keeps rotten company

Zelaya chums around with Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn, Jeremiah Wright, Bill Daley, Geo Soros? What a small world we live in.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-06-29 09:25  

#3  Man I bet Barry, Nacny, and Hillary wished they could do this. If your keeping score this is the third time our country has sided against democray: Israel, Iran, and now Hunduras. Paging Jimmy Carter!
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2009-06-29 08:50  

#2  The fact that they are strictly following the constitution is exactly why this is being condemned so loudly in the usual quarters. It sets a bad precedent.
Posted by: gromky   2009-06-29 08:45  

#1  Hondouras is fighting back a hostile takeover by enforcing the constitution. What a concept! Maybe we should try that. Seems like or constitution has been bypassed quite a lot recently.
Posted by: Richard of Oregon   2009-06-29 08:22  

00:00