You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Global Warming Alert: Fatties cause global warming
2009-04-21
THE rising number of fat people was yesterday blamed for global warming.

Scientists warned that the increase in big-eaters means more food production — a major cause of CO2 gas emissions warming the planet.

Overweight people are also more likely to drive, adding to environmental damage.

Dr Phil Edwards, of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said: “Moving about in a heavy body is like driving in a gas guzzler.”

Each fat person is said to be responsible for emitting a tonne more of climate-warming carbon dioxide per year than a thin one.

It means an extra BILLION TONNES of CO2 a year is created, according to World Health Organisation estimates of overweight people.

The scientists say providing extra grub for them to guzzle adds to carbon emissions that heat up the world, melting polar ice caps, raising sea levels and killing rain forests.

The environmental impact of fat humans is made even worse because they are more likely to travel by car — another major cause of carbon emissions.

Battle

And researchers at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine say wealthy nations like the US and Britain are getting fatter by the decade.

Dr Phil Edwards said: “Food production accounts for about one fifth of greenhouse gases.

“We need to do a lot more to reverse the global trend towards fatness. It is a key factor in the battle to reduce carbon emissions and slow climate change.

“It is time we took account of the amount we are eating.

“This is about over-consumption by the wealthy countries. And the world demand for meat is increasing to match that of Britain and America.

“It is also much easier to get in your car and pick up a pint of milk than to take a walk.”

The study by Dr Edwards and colleague Ian Roberts is published in the International Journal of Epidemiology.

Dr Edwards went on: “We are not just pointing the finger at fat people. All populations are getting fatter and it has an impact on the environment.

“UK health surveys estimate fatness has increased from an average body mass index of 26 to 27 in the last ten years.

“That’s equivalent to about half a stone for every person.”

Anyone with a BMI above 25 is overweight, while more than 30 is obese.

A staggering 40 per cent of Americans are obese, among 300 million worldwide.

Disasters

Australian Professor Paul Zimmet predicted a disastrous obesity pandemic back in 2006.

And Oxfam warned yesterday that the number of people hit by climate-related disasters will soar by more than half in the next six years to 375million.

The impact of more storms, floods and droughts could overwhelm aid organisations.

Sun doctor Carol Cooper said last night: “I’m not sure which came first, people getting fat and driving or the other way around. It is true fat people eat more food than average.

“A few obese people have a hormone problem, although most simply don’t use enough calories and eat too many. But making them feel guilty antagonises them and may not help.”
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#23  ed beat me too it, funny as hell besoeker, we need too see a pic as proof GirlTHursday, j/k
Posted by: rabid whitetail   2009-04-21 20:24  

#22  It's a wonderful world: whatever your taste, there are numerous girls (or guys, as the case may be) to suit!
Posted by: trailing wife    2009-04-21 19:49  

#21  A Mainer's preference, GT, not necessarily mine...I'm not in Maine.

B, wouldn't you prefer a bourbon bottle to an oxygen one?
Posted by: no mo uro   2009-04-21 19:46  

#20  shaving their legs without grunting

Whahahaha! A wicked sense of humour. I love it.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-04-21 18:18  

#19  Yes, they are to a point. But thin women can actually bend over to do tasks like gardening, picking up things, and shaving their legs without grunting. I guess it depends where the locale is in terms of usefulness.
Posted by: GirlThursday   2009-04-21 18:14  

#18  Don't matter much no mo..... so long as they can change a keg and keep an eye on my oxygen bottle. :)
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-04-21 18:13  

#17  But fat women are useful.

As they say in Maine, "Warm in winter, shade in summer......."
Posted by: no mo uro   2009-04-21 18:06  

#16  hell yea, I hate food, if it could come in a convenient one-a-day tablet, i'd love it.

but on the Greenhouse gas, I fear we're all going to be forced by the gummint to drive those boxy looking fiberglass CAT (compressed air technology) engine cars theyve developed in France. They're actually purdy cool if they could make them look a little better.
Posted by: GirlThursday   2009-04-21 17:49  

#15  Prolly too malnourished to proofread after all that. :)
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-04-21 17:38  

#14  Oh yea, but one of my pecadilloes is not proofreading properly. Those keys have outwitted me!
Posted by: GirlThursday   2009-04-21 16:48  

#13  In truth Im skinny and save money on account of it because it costs a hell of a lot less at my feedings because my stomach is not stretched out and grumbling for food all the time.

Im also not completely unfortunate in the looks department, so less "poodle fat" made at chemical plants ends up smeared on my face to make me look okay.

I also consume less oxygen because Im aerobically fit, whereby my lung efficiency means I take less breathes per minute, with better absorbtion. As for greenhouse gas, hey Im just like the average Joe.

And hell yea, I drive my CO2 happy ass to sales in my combustion engine car, just so ya know. My car seats dont have indentations from my fat ass though. Chew on that Gore, your logic is flawed...Fat and thin people drive, and emit CO2 imagine that.

Posted by: GirlThursday   2009-04-21 16:40  

#12  Actually there should be a tax on skinny people. After all they are STARVING THE POOR PLANET by not producing their fair quota of CO2.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2009-04-21 13:27  

#11  But people getting fat is a means of sequestering carbon. CO2 leaves the air to become grass, grass becomes a cow, cow becomes food, food becomes a fat person's belly. It's the skinny people who are the problem, they keep buring all the food they consume and return it to the atmosphere as CO2. Do the earth some good, eat a bag of Cheetos and take a nap.

My logic is just as sound as that which the environuts spew...
Posted by: Chemist   2009-04-21 13:16  

#10  Cap and Trade calories. Skinny people could sell calorie credits to larger people.

A typical SF Ruth's Chris restaurant tab:

2 - Fillets - $70.00
1 - Mushrooms- 9.50
2 - B/Potato - 16.00
1 - Mixed/Veg- 7.50
2 - Desserts - 15.00
2 - Coffee - 11.00
1 - B/Cabernet - 55.00
Sub Total $184.00
Calorie > cap - 20.00
Tax -20.91
Tip -36.80
Total - $261.71
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2009-04-21 12:59  

#9  Ya notice Al didn't bring this one up...
Posted by: tu3031   2009-04-21 12:37  

#8  More anti-Americanism and anti-capitalism from across the pond. Even McDonald's beats British food, hands down.
Posted by: Thealing Borgia 122   2009-04-21 12:29  

#7  Damn, when I saw the headline I thought this might be an anti-marijuana article. Silly ol' chubby me.
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2009-04-21 12:26  

#6  fir = fair
Posted by: ed   2009-04-21 10:07  

#5  Dammit! Al Gore is using for than his fir share again.
Posted by: ed   2009-04-21 10:02  

#4  This is bad news for places like Mauritania.
Posted by: Zorba Craising6734   2009-04-21 09:54  

#3  Â“Moving about in a heavy body is like driving in a gas guzzler.”

so.many.damn.people.in.many.sizes.

Billions and billions and billions and billions and billions being born round the clock. If it didnt conflict with my faith, I'd say sterilization programs sound good.

To reduce population, I offer a few alternatives:

How about no more quarter beer nights, no more male/female mixers, no more scanty or tight clothing, no co-ed colleges. Bring back a modernized chastity belt. Keep men and women separated, that way they'll become depressed and eat even more. Then when they become supersized to like 300 pounds, nobody will be able to easily get in their pants, not even themselves. The new celebrities will be farmers, because they'll be out growing everyones food and be some of the only skinny people.

Maybe the global warming experts should conduct a study on burgeoning pants, and the extra industrial by-products to make all them elastic waist pants.

Bottom line, to play devil's advocate, would sneaking birth control in the water supply really be that bad?
Posted by: GirlThursday   2009-04-21 09:25  

#2  Just ignore that 'fat' people are far more effective in storing usable food when famine hit. The only survivors in the collapse of the system that makes society possible [as seen in Ethiopia, Somalia, etc] are those who's bodies can squeeze the last bit of nutrient from something that passes as food. Tens of thousands of years of evolution in an environment that was just as much famine as feast made it a survival mechanism for being around to reproduce. These 'bright' people assume that their environment is not subject to collapse because their 'history' only starts with their adolescent awareness.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-04-21 08:34  

#1  "It is time we took account of the amount we are eating.

Skinny little men in spandex riding expensive bicycles....why do they hate us?

What's coming next.....caloric intake taxes? Food stamps permits? Girth based procreational restrictions? A permanent ban on Anglo-American Renaissance Feasting? Beer and fried foods tax disincentives? Special federal client licensing and eating permits for Hooters and other resturants? A ban on golf carts? Smaller, more compact, mass restrictive airline seating? I recommend The Army Field Manual Army Regulation 600-9, selective weigh-in, marriage licensing weigh-ins, body scanning, pinch tests, height-weight credits. Mandetory Saturday Volksmarching?
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-04-21 07:59  

00:00