You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
March Auto sales deep in the dumper
2009-04-02
DETROIT, April 1 (Reuters) - U.S. auto sales fell 37 percent in March, a smaller-than-expected drop that encouraged hope the world's largest car market is nearing a bottom after a freefall that has pulled the industry into a deepening crisis.

General Motors Corp, which has until June to complete a new restructuring under federal oversight that could push it into bankruptcy, said its sales fell 45 percent, the largest decline of any of the major automakers.

Industry-wide sales dropped for the 17th consecutive month but were up from February with the help of record discounts and higher sales to fleet operators such as government agencies. Auto sales typically account for as much as a fifth of overall U.S. retail sales and industry executives held out hope that the market would hit bottom over the next quarter or so.

"I think we're seeing maybe the first signs of a brightening in the outlook for the auto industry in March," GM chief sales analyst Mike DiGiovanni said on a conference call.

Sales for Ford Motor Co, the only U.S. automaker operating without government aid, dropped 41 percent. Major Japanese automakers and Chrysler LLC posted sales declines in a narrow range between 36 percent and 39 percent.

Overall sales came in at a rate of almost 9.9 million vehicles on the annualized rate tracked by analysts, down sharply from the average near 16 million over the past decade.

"We believe we may be at or near the trough of the industry's year-to-year comparisons but do not see an uptick in industry demand before (the fourth quarter) at the earliest," said Efraim Levy, an equity analyst with Standard & Poor's.

Discounts hit a record in March, averaging $3,169 per vehicle based on the value of offers including rebates and zero-percent financing, auto website Edmunds.com said. Both GM and Ford began rolling out new sales programs intended to win over car shoppers worried about losing their jobs by promising to cover loan payments if that happens.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#19  I am going to buy a a Toyota this weekend ... or maybe the new Diesel Jetta. I haven't decided yet.
Posted by: crosspatch   2009-04-02 23:31  

#18  Fix the clutch, Anguper, then she's good for another 25 years. Consider trading up for my 1989 S-10.
Posted by: KBK   2009-04-02 21:03  

#17  Congrats on the better jobs, Darth!

I'm grateful for the one I have, even if I have been working a lot fewer hours lately.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-04-02 19:30  

#16  So's my 1998 one, Sea. :-D
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-04-02 19:27  

#15  Just kidding. I've got an old restored vehicle myself. I use that line when someone comments on it.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-04-02 19:16  

#14  It was paid off the day I got it, $11,000! They don't make 'em like that anymore.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2009-04-02 19:11  

#13  Keep up with the payments Anguper. A few more years and it will all be yours. :)
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-04-02 19:07  

#12  I bought my new 1983 F250 HD with a 6.9L diesel in May 1983. It's so old it has been grandfathered out of my state's emissions testing program. It has 160,000 miles on it. Starts & runs well, Gets 22-24 mpg around town, empty. In 2001 I hit a deer while going 70 mph, the front mounted spare saved me a lot of trouble & the damage was repaired cheap. The clutch hydraulics went out last week. What to do, what to do...
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2009-04-02 19:03  

#11  My 1990 Volvo 740 is nearing 300,000 and leaks a bit of oil. She's just about broken in.

If my girl and I are going out, we'll take her Toyota or Infiniti.

I have no idea of my mileage - don't care. Paid for, good running vehicles are cheaper than buying new, fuel-sipping American marqued POSes any day.

Posted by: GORT   2009-04-02 15:22  

#10  I had a 85 BMW for 750,000 miles. After initial break-in I used Mobil 1 oil for it's entire life. Although the compression was nothing like new it still did't turn into a hybrid, burning oil and gas. I used a quart every 2,000 to 2,500 miles.

I was having expensive non powertrain problems. In 06 the heater core went. It seems the Huns hold up the heater core and build the car around it. Lot's of labor cost to replace so I sold the car to the State of California for $650 and sent it to the big parking lot in the sky.
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2009-04-02 13:31  

#9  Edit:

Second car. We have one that works great but we need two now since the wife also got a better job.
Posted by: DarthVader   2009-04-02 12:35  

#8  I just got a much better paying job and a promotion, but it is farther away so we will have to buy a new car.

Make me a deal, auto-boy! I know you are desperate as a drunk-ugly woman at last call!
Posted by: DarthVader   2009-04-02 12:34  

#7  I currently own an 1988 Isuzu pickup 5 speed stick,(Sorta a chevy, chevy owns isuzu, twin to an S 10) it's rusting, but the drivetrain's sound, needs occasional U joints, and just put in a replacement Radiator, considering it's got around 250 K I'm very happy with it.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-04-02 12:05  

#6  My 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier has 158,000 miles on it. I still get 30 mpg. I don't, however do much city driving.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2009-04-02 11:56  

#5  @procopius, it's my take that the emission regs made engines more durable because they had to pass tests after 50K(?) miles. Also, better ring and valve guide technology helped.

In any case, in the '60s we were happy to get 60K from a Chevy valve job. Now, I've got 300K on my Subaru, with no engine problems. It gets about 500 miles per quart, and half of that is leaks. But it's $1000 to fix the leaks, so the payback is maybe 10 years, not including cost of money. I'll just keep feeding it oil.

I'm having problems wearing it out - but the New England rust is starting to get to it. It will never make another 10 years.

I saw a Honda Civic with over 400K miles on it, and it looked like the engine had never been touched. The trick is to change the oil every 3000 miles.
Posted by: KBK   2009-04-02 11:15  

#4  My 2002 Honda is running just fine, thankyouverymuch.
Posted by: Seafarious   2009-04-02 10:57  

#3  If GM is going to declare bankruptcy, why did we have to give them billions in the past couple of months? Seems to me they should have declared last fall (autumn to you non-Yanks) and saved us a lot of money and gotten on the right track sooner. WTF.
Posted by: Spot   2009-04-02 10:29  

#2  This week the "administration" began to show the first indications of an admission that a structured bankruptsy might be the preferred method of dealing with GM. Of course the news could not have been presented by veteran CEO Rick Wagoner. A cleansing "CHANGE" had to take place first and a new talking dog brought on stage. Kegs of Budweiser must be popping at Black Lake. Details of the structured bankruptsy may be quite interesting.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-04-02 10:25  

#1  In its a feature not a bug dept, as real competition made cars more reliable and sustainable through regular maintenance, the market reaches a point where for practical reasons people can choose to put off buying a new car and still have transportation. Expensive fashion statements are among the first to be dropped when the crimp hits the household budget.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-04-02 10:12  

00:00