| Submit your comments on this article |
| India-Pakistan |
| Petraeus hints at striking targets within Pak as 'Last Resort' |
| 2009-03-31 |
| The U.S. military will reserve the "right of last resort" to take out threats inside Pakistan, but it would prefer to enable the Pakistani military to do the job itself, Gen. David Petraeus said Monday in an exclusive interview with a US television channel. The commander of U.S. Central Command was interviewed as the Obama administration prepares to step up the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. Asked about lingering concerns that Pakistan is not fully on board, Petraeus told media that the U.S. military is putting "additional focus" on rooting out ties between Pakistan''''s intelligence service and the Taliban. One incident of obvious cooperation between the Pakistani intelligence community and extremists has already been uncovered, he said. "There is a case in the past year or so that we think was unambiguous. There appears to have been a warning prior to a Pakistani operation," Petraeus said. But he said trust between the two countries will be key as President Obama seeks more Pakistani cooperation and calls for billions in aid to the country. "I think we are building that kind of trust. And that''''s the way I think is the best description for that. And it''''s hugely important that that trust be built," Petraeus said, pointing to "gradually increasing intelligence sharing" among Afghan, Pakistani and U.S. forces along the border. Obama, in unveiling his regional plan for Afghanistan and Pakistan on Friday, said the U.S. will "insist that action be taken, one way or another, when we have intelligence about high-level terrorist targets." He added on Sunday that "we''''re going after" such targets, though the U.S. will need to work with Pakistan''''s government to do so. He did not specifically say U.S. troops could be sent into the country. Asked about the president''''s comments, Petraeus signaled that all options would be on the table. "I think we would never give up, if you will, the right of last resort if we assess something as a threat to us, noting that what we want to do is enable the Pakistanis, help them, assist them to deal with the problem that we now think, and their leaders certainly now think, represents the most important existential threat to their country, not just to the rest of the world," he said. The Pakistanis have expressed frustration over unmanned U.S. drone strikes to take out terrorist targets inside their border. But Petraeus said the U.S. is mindful of perceptions in the region. "It''''s hugely important that we be seen as good neighbors, as friends, certainly fierce warriors who will go after the enemy and stay after them -- but also as individuals who try to avoid civilian casualties whenever possible and are seen again as supporting the people and trying to help them achieve a better life," Petraeus said, specifically referring to the fight on the Afghan side of the border. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #7 Good plan OP. Only problem would be the outrage over putting the entire Pak population to the sword, which exactly what would be required. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2009-03-31 17:17 |
| #6 Nothing will be resolved as long as there is still a "Pakistan". The United States and India need to form a joint strike command, and take out the Pakistani nukes and military. It would all be over in about two weeks, with the Pak army shredded, the US in Rawalpindi and India in Lahore. China may bitch and scream, but they're not going to go to war over Pakistan (neither will anyone else, except maybe Bangladesh, and that would be suicide). With Afghanistan (US proxy) on the west bank of the Indus and India on the right bank, a lot of long-term problems would be eliminated, including 400,000+ fake passports. |
| Posted by: Old Patriot 2009-03-31 16:44 |
| #5 Sovereignty is not invocable where a state is harboring belligerents that act against another country. I believe that a majority of Punjabis would support US operations against Pak based Pashtuns. And the rest of the ethnics do not matter. |
| Posted by: Jereger Hapsburg2215 2009-03-31 16:43 |
| #4 ...and by 'last resort', we mean next Tuesday. |
| Posted by: SteveS 2009-03-31 13:40 |
| #3 "threats inside Pakistan" Too much to hope that he's talking about the ISI... of course, he is known for thinking outside the box..... |
| Posted by: Snenter McGurque6942 2009-03-31 12:15 |
| #2 They were deeply unpopular in Pakland and not to mention an act of war on a sovereign state. Hague Convention of 1907 - "a neutral country has the obligation not to allow its territory to be used by a belligerent. If the neutral country is unwilling or unable to prevent this, the other belligerent has the right to take appropriate counteraction." Pakistan is allowing its territory to be used for belligerent actions in Afghanistan, a sovereign state, and could be indeed construed as an act of war. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2009-03-31 07:39 |
| #1 Reading between the lines. This is cover for a reduction or elimination of drone strikes in Pakland. All credit to the Bush administrations arm twisting that allowed them to continue as long as they did. They were deeply unpopular in Pakland and not to mention an act of war on a sovereign state. |
| Posted by: phil_b 2009-03-31 01:03 |