You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Don't Count out 'Mandatory' Service Yet
2009-03-29
HB 1388 "quietly" passed the Senate last week. Now, this bill is working itself through the process.
A proposal in Congress to study whether "mandatory" service should be required of all young people in the United States has suddenly disappeared from a bill that would reauthorize other national service programs such as AmeriCorps. But the plan has appeared in another bill at just about the same time.

WND reported more than a week ago on a plan in the U.S. House of Representatives to determine whether "a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people" should be developed across the United States. But the language that was included in H.R. 1388 suddenly disappeared.

At about the same time, H.R. 1444 by U.S. Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., appeared and was assigned to the House Committee on Labor and Education.

The bill, under Section 4 (b)6, states:

Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.

The original plan not only reauthorized existing programs but added "new programs and studies" with a forecast funding level of $6 billion over the next five years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

It raised immediate concerns that the effort, which is intended to include 250,000 "volunteers," is the beginning of what President Obama called his "National Civilian Security Force" in a speech last year in which he urged creating an organization as big and well-funded as the U.S. military. He has declined since then to elaborate.

The newest plan says the aim is "to establish the Congressional Commission on Civic Service to study methods of improving and promoting volunteerism and national service, and for other purposes."

It would be directed to identify how issues that deter volunteerism "and national service" can be overcome, determine what role should government have "in overcoming" those issues, evaluate the "existing databases" for linking "would-be volunteers and service providers," and referred to the "workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement."

The proposal also speculates on a "public service academy, a four-year institution that offers a federally funded undergraduate education with a focus on training future public sector leaders."

Like the provisions in the earlier bill, it also includes children down to primary school, requiring a review of "the means to develop awareness of national service and volunteer opportunities at a young age by creating, expanding and promoting service options for primary and secondary school students and by raising awareness of existing incentives."
Posted by:Sherry

#10  I believed 2 years of national service should be required once. Not brown shirts, but something. Problem is with that is this.
Posted by: newc   2009-03-29 21:40  

#9  I'm not suprised that 'U.S. Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash.' introduced this bill. Remember this is the guy who 'leaked' the private cell-phone conversation between Newt and someone who a Democratic operative recorded.

He's as slimey as they come and often does the DNC's dirty work.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2009-03-29 21:04  

#8  Procop,
The first few decades of census data reflected interest mainly in sex and those very ages, presumably because they were done to determine the size of an available militia.
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-03-29 19:32  

#7  Lovely.
I'm a available for a meeting at the White House to teach some history.
Posted by: European Conservative   2009-03-29 19:15  

#6  I thought it was predicted that George W. Bush would re-establish the Draft. But it seems President Obama has decided to do so instead.
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-03-29 19:13  

#5  Done by illiterates who won't read the Constitution. They often cite the 'draft' as an excuse, but the 'draft' is constitutionally based through Article I, Section 8 which grants Congress the power to establish and regulate the militia. It does that through Title 10 USC designating every male 17 to 45 as members of the unorganized militia. The 'draft' is the selective activation of that federal militia. Any other 'mandatory' service is involuntary servitude and a violation of the 13th Amendment. Given that the words of the Constitution don't seem to matter to the ruling elite [you know, it's a living document rationale], we're watching America presided over by a black man bringing slavery back as a social institution. The mind boggles. Remember, its never been about truth or justice, it's always been about power.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-03-29 19:11  

#4  Slavery is Slavery.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles the flatulent   2009-03-29 18:14  

#3  
HR 1388.

I s'pose the HR numbers are assigned sequentially so it's prolly random, but I must point out that the number 88 is favored by neonazis and Hitler fanbois... 88 = HH = Heil Hitler.
Posted by: Ulolurong Henbane9825   2009-03-29 17:30  

#2  And you can but guess at who will be the Dean of such a public service academy, who the faculty will be, and what the curriculum will be.
Posted by: Steve White   2009-03-29 17:21  

#1  The proposal also speculates on a "public service academy, a four-year institution that offers a federally funded undergraduate education with a focus on training future public sector leaders."

Like the École Nationale d'Administration in France. Just what we need - a small permanent government elite managing a vastly expanded public sector.
Posted by: DMFD   2009-03-29 17:06  

00:00