You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Good News is No News(papers)
2009-03-13
The history of The Seattle Post-Intelligencer stretches back more than two decades before Washington became a state, but after 146 years of publishing, the paper is expected to print its last issue next week, perhaps surviving only in a much smaller online version.

And it is not alone. The Rocky Mountain News shut down two weeks ago, and The Tucson Citizen is expected to fold next week.

At least Denver, Seattle and Tucson still have daily papers. But now, some economists and newspaper executives say it is only a matter of time -- and probably not much time at that -- before some major American city is left with no prominent local newspaper at all. "In 2009 and 2010, all the two-newspaper markets will become one-newspaper markets, and you will start to see one-newspaper markets become no-newspaper markets," said Mike Simonton, a senior director at Fitch Ratings, who analyzes the industry.

Many critics and competitors of newspapers -- including online start-ups that have been hailed as the future of journalism -- say that no one should welcome their demise.

"It would be a terrible thing for any city for the dominant paper to go under, because that's who does the bulk of the serious reporting," said Joel Kramer, former editor and publisher of The Star Tribune and now the editor and chief executive of MinnPost .com, an online news organization in Minneapolis. "Places like us would spring up," he said, "but they wouldn't be nearly as big. We can tweak the papers and compete with them, but we can't replace them."

No one knows which will be the first big city without a large paper, but there are candidates all across the country. The Hearst Corporation, which owns The Post-Intelligencer, has also threatened to close The San Francisco Chronicle, which lost more than $1 million a week last year, unless it can wring significant savings from the operation.

In a tentative deal reached Tuesday night, the California Media Workers Guild agreed to less vacation time, longer workweeks and more flexibility for The Chronicle to make layoffs without regard to seniority. Union officials say they have been told to expect the elimination of at least 150 guild jobs, almost one-third of the total, and management is still trying to negotiate concessions from the Teamsters union.

Advance Publications said last fall that it might shut down The Star-Ledger, the dominant paper in New Jersey, but a set of cutbacks and union concessions kept the paper alive in much-downsized form.

The top papers in many markets, like The Star Tribune in Minneapolis, The Philadelphia Inquirer and The New Haven Register, belong to companies that have gone into bankruptcy in the last three months. The owners insist they have no intention of closing publications, but the management making those assurances may not be in charge when the companies emerge from reorganization.

Other publishers, like the Seattle Times Company and MediaNews Group, owner of The Denver Post, The San Jose Mercury News and The Detroit News, are seen as being at risk of bankruptcy. Many newspapers -- from The Miami Herald to The Chicago Sun-Times -- have been put up for sale, with no buyers on the horizon.

Ad revenue, the industry's lifeblood, has dropped about 25 percent in the last two years (by comparison, automotive revenue for Detroit's Big Three fell about 15 percent during the same period, although it has accelerated recently), and that slide, accelerated by the recession, shows no sign of leveling off in 2009.

Web sites like Craigslist have been to classified ads what the internal combustion engine was to horse-drawn buggies. The stock prices of most newspaper publishers have dropped more than 90 percent from their peaks.

And magnifying the problem, for many chains, is a heavy burden of debt that they took on, mostly in a spree of buying other newspapers from 2005 to 2007, just before the bottom dropped out of the business.

The Tribune Company, for instance, owner of The Chicago Tribune, The Los Angeles Times and other papers, filed for bankruptcy in December, largely because of its debt load. The reality is that even though the economic climate is hard for newspapers, without their debt payments the publishers in bankruptcy would still make money, as do most newspapers around the country.

But profits are shrinking fast; taken together, major chains had an operating profit margin of about 10 percent in 2008, down from more than 20 percent as recently as 2004, according to research by John Morton, an independent analyst.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#9  But just what the hell are we going to line the birdcages with?
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2009-03-13 17:04  

#8  We'd still have

Nuggests
Sea-of-fire
RAB Stories
Spy Squirrels

That's plenty.
Posted by: .5MT   2009-03-13 13:50  

#7  Is the PakiTimes mainstream?
Posted by: .5MT   2009-03-13 13:48  

#6  If Rantburg eliminated all feeds & posts that originated in the MSM, it would have very little to discuss.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418    2009-03-13 11:59  

#5  Media Workers Guild? Teamsters? Yikes!

Save a tree. Read Rantburg.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2009-03-13 11:54  

#4  and after the collapse of these papers the masses of these cities might (honestly) be less ignorant & mis-informed then they were before...
Posted by: Andy Ulusoque aka Broadhead6   2009-03-13 10:50  

#3  Journalist and editors join thousands of out of work switchboard operators*.

* who never got universities to 'professionalize' their trade career choice with paper.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2009-03-13 09:54  

#2  The news business is facing the 'perfect storm.' Alienate half their potential market with extremely biased reporting. Lose another huge chunk to the idiocratization of America - the only news most care about shows on 'E'. Then face lower cost/higher effectivenss competition in the classified ad business. And of course for most purposes internet news distribution is cheaper and better. And if that was not enough, when the economy tanks, discretionary spending tanks even more, and news (papers, magazines, cable etc.) is discretionary.
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-03-13 09:41  

#1  no one should welcome their demise.

See how utterly out of touch they are? They see themselves as white knights, valiantly crusading for the public interest. In reality, they abuse their positions to advocate their own political viewpoints. The whole system is rotten to the core and only wholesale desctruction can "save" it. Sort of like how only a disaster or famine can "save" an overpopulated nation.
Posted by: gromky   2009-03-13 04:33  

00:00