| Submit your comments on this article |
| Afghanistan |
| Pak-style truce in Afghanistan acceptable: US |
| 2009-02-20 |
| KRAKOW, Poland: US defence secretary Robert Gates said on Friday that Washington could accept a political agreement between the Afghan government and Taliban rebels along the lines of a truce in neighbouring Pakistan. Gates' comments at the close of a NATO meeting contrasted with those of Richard Holbrooke, the new US envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, who said this week that he was worried that the peace deal was tantamount to surrender by Pakistan. On Monday, Pakistan announced it would agree to the imposition of Islamic law in the restive Swat valley in the northwest part of the country as part of an agreement aimed at restoring peace after an 18-month military campaign. The pact was spearheaded by a hard-line cleric who is negotiating with the Taliban in the valley to give up their arms. Asked whether Washington would approve an agreement between the Kabul government and Taliban guerrillas along similar lines, Gates replied: "If there is a reconciliation, if insurgents are willing to put down their arms, if the reconciliation is essentially on the terms being offered by the government then I think we would be very open to that. "We have said all along that ultimately some sort of political reconciliation has to be part of the long-term solution in Afghanistan," Gates said. Afghanistan's government has said it wants to engage Taliban guerrillas who are not "hard-liners" to lay down their arms in return for a political role in the country. But representatives of the Taliban, who have made significant military gains in the last two years and now control vast swathes of countryside, say they will not negotiate while foreign troops remain in Afghanistan. A similar deal in Swat last year collapsed in a few months and was blamed for giving insurgents time to regroup. NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said at the defence meeting that a broader regional approach was needed to help put down the insurgency in Afghanistan. The focus would be on more involvement from Pakistan, but could include Iran one day, he said. He said the suggestion does not mean that NATO plans to enter into dialogue with Iran immediately but that Tehran could be involved "at a certain stage ... in a regional approach toward Afghanistan." |
| Posted by:john frum |
| #3 Works for me. Afhanistan is a crap hole. There is no way we are going to implement democracy there. Waste of lives and money. |
| Posted by: remoteman 2009-02-20 18:29 |
| #2 Not that I think that would be a bad thing as long as we could keep the drone base, wherever that is, and continue to take pot shots at Binny. |
| Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2009-02-20 16:49 |
| #1 Just any little thing that allows us to declare victory and get the hell outta there, right? |
| Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2009-02-20 16:47 |