You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caribbean-Latin America
Drug gangs drive off cops, terrorize Mexican town
2009-02-18
For people caught inside Mexico's drug corridors, life is about keeping your head down and watching your back, especially when the sun dips behind the cactus-studded horizon.

No town knows this better than Villa Ahumada, where the entire police force quit after 70 cartel hit men roared through last spring, killing the police chief, two officers and three townspeople.

Residents were left defenseless again last week when gunmen returned and kidnapped nine people, despite the soldiers manning checkpoints far outside town.

"This was a mellow town where we would walk along main street at night. But now we're too scared to even go out," said Zaida de Santiago.

For this lanky 14-year-old, everything changed last May 17. She was dancing at a neighbor's ranch when gunfire shattered the night. The party's hosts turned off the lights and silenced the music. The guests stood frozen, ears trained to the sound of automatic weapons as the gunmen raced down gravel streets in their SUVs.

When the sun rose hours later, the party guests learned that armed cartel commandos had killed the police chief and five others. Soon after, the rest of the 20-member force quit in fear. "That day will always remain burned in my mind," Santiago said.

Federal investigators say Villa Ahumada is a key stop along one of Mexico's busiest drug smuggling routes, where the Sinaloa cartel has been challenging the Juarez gang for control. The military staffs checkpoints miles outside town, and soldiers and federal police roll through each day, but residents are largely left on their own.
Posted by:Fred

#7  As Shakespeare said, "First, we'll kill the lawyers". As the ACLU, expecially, continues to use the law as a bludgeon to beat others down, the rest of us get very, very angry. When that anger explodes, there will no longer be an ACLU, and there will be hundreds or thousands of judges needed to replace the old ones. It's no longer a matter of "if", only of "when".
Posted by: Old Patriot   2009-02-18 21:16  

#6  Let me give you the latest wrinkle on the 2nd amendment assault in California. Most of the counties have very restrictive or non-existant Concealed Carry permit rules (CCW). Some of the more rural counties in the interior central valley had reasonable systems. Soooooo anti-gun attorneys have determined that by suing a just retired Sheriff for personal liability claiming he handed out permits as political favors and thereby was outside the scope of his duties, they can have a chilling effect on all of the Chiefs and Sheriff's ststewide. After 16 years of continuous licensing, my own county sheriff has just lawyered up and made the process virtually impossible. In specific, citing "personal protection" was no longer deemed sufficient justification for a permit. It must have a documented threat nexus of be work related. Issuance of permits in that county have fallen by over 90%.

Personal liability trumps reasonable conformity to the 2nd amendment. Welcome to the future my friends....
Posted by: Thaing Dark Lord of the Pixies1544   2009-02-18 15:27  

#5  The Magnificent Seven could not be reached for comment.
Posted by: no mo uro   2009-02-18 13:25  

#4  OS, We sort of have the Second Amendment in the U.S. Depends upon what state you live in. Laws regulating CC is a patchwork quilt of differing laws--anything from effectively preventing CC to fewer restrictions. The 2nd Amend. seems to be a thing to be circumvented by the liberals (read socialists). It is an unpleasant nuisance to be gotten around for people like Diane Feinstein, Charles Schumer, Dick Durbin, Bobby Rush, BO, etc.
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-02-18 09:33  

#3  This is no different from the good old days, with bandito bands roaming around. The PRI party ruled Mexico from the 1920s to the 1990s, by keeping a handle on this nonsense, and they will probably come back because of this.

Whether or not this is before or after a bloody civil war remains to be seen.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2009-02-18 09:30  

#2  Armed Populace.

Its a shame Mexico has draconian laws that keep firearms out of the hand of ordinary people, but criminals get military armament.

Thank God for he Second Amendment here in the US
Posted by: OldSpook   2009-02-18 08:42  

#1  the military checkpoints are more to shakedown money from tourists
Posted by: Frank G   2009-02-18 07:18  

00:00