You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Pak says evidence gathered by US, UK won't stand in court
2008-12-28
NEW DELHI: Pakistan has rejected evidence provided by the US and UK on involvement of its citizens in the Mumbai attacks. It has said the information provided would not stand scrutiny in any court.
Most especially not an Islamic court ...
The evidence includes a confession by arrested terrorist Ajmal Amir Kasab but Pakistani officials have contended that since it had been obtained by Indians under duress, this could not be admissible in court.
No doubt Inspectors Chaudhary and Mukharjee were swinging the number 7 truncheons with gusto ...
Meanwhile, India kept up the pressure on Pakistan. Foreign minister Pranab Mukherjee said on Sunday that India had not served any ultimatum to Pakistan to take action on terrorists or terror camps. However, India insisted that Pakistan eliminate all terrorist groups from its territory as it had promised.

Addressing a group in Jharkhand, Mukherjee said Pakistan should admit that terrorists involved in the Mumbai attacks came from there. "If all these things are done, then there is no problem at all," he said. "Not once, but twice Pakistan had made a commitment. Once by Musharraf and now by President Zardari. Where is the commitment? Where is the action against terrorists," he added.

Telephone numbers of LeT commanders like Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi and Zarar Shah had been given, reports from Pakistan said, as well as call logs and intercepts. Both US and UK have told Pakistan that India's allegation that the LeT had masterminded the operation was correct.

Officials said US and UK came armed with a much more evidence of Pakistan's complicity than even India had access to. Thanks to their superior tech-int, they gathered more evidence against Pakistan, which, incidentally they did not share with India.

Pakistan's excuse now is that if it's expected to use all this evidence to put people like Lakhvi and Shah on trial, it would need testimonies from Indian witnesses, and all the mobile phones and satphones that were used for evidence. Evidently, this is a dead end-road. If and when India gives up its own information to Pakistan, it would be met with exactly the same kind of belligerence, say officials.
Which is the whole point. Remember, the Taliban tried this trick right after 9/11, and GWB wouldn't fall for it.
Within India, though, as more information becomes available, officials are coming round to the view that there was substantial involvement of the army-ISI complex.

"We have evidence and gave the names, not once but ten times. Pakistan had earlier accepted that the perpetrators of Mumbai attacks emanated from there. But now they are contradicting it," Mukherjee said. However, on the Mumbai attacks, he said India would give all information to Pakistan after the investigations were over.

Meanwhile, Mukherjee regretted that Pakistan had gone back on its statement that Maulana Masood Azhar had been detained. He said, "The Pakistani defence minister had earlier said that the Jaish chief was under house arrest. Now some others say he is not in Pakistan. Who is telling the truth? It is Pakistan which has to tell that."
Posted by:john frum

#7  I don't recall India saying anything about court....
Posted by: 3dc   2008-12-28 22:28  

#6  PAKISTANI DEFENCE FORUM/WORLD MIL FORUM > CHINA: MUMBAI ATTACKS MASTERMIND NOT YET IDENTIFIED [advises PK, India not to resort to war]; + SINO-INDIAN WAR AFTER A PAKISTAN-INDIAN WAR WILL BE A DISASTER FOR ASIA.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-12-28 21:26  

#5  Well, yeah, everyone knows that Pakistan sets the standard for forensic evidence and respect for the human rights of the accused.
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2008-12-28 20:36  

#4  yeah, like the Pakis have such a high jurisprudence standard...since when?
Posted by: HAMMERHEAD   2008-12-28 18:39  

#3  Must be talking about a Sharia court - where an Infidel's testimony is worthless against a muslim.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2008-12-28 17:53  

#2  It has said the information provided would not stand scrutiny in any court.

"...Not in one of OUR courts, anyways."

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2008-12-28 17:05  

#1  Pak says evidence gathered by US, UK won't stand in court

Not after they got through with it, anyway.
Posted by: gorb   2008-12-28 17:03  

00:00