You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Families Ask Bush to Seize Land Parcel for 9/11 Memorial
2008-12-28
It has been more than seven years since 20-year-old Deora Bodley and 39 other passengers and crew died in the fiery crash of United Airlines Flight 93, their hijacked plane disintegrating in a grove of hemlock trees outside Shanksville, Pa. Most of the remains from the tragedy on Sept. 11, 2001, were never recovered, making the bowl-shaped crash site in the western Pennsylvania countryside an unofficial cemetery and, for surviving relatives, sacred ground.

But efforts to buy property for a national Flight 93 memorial have bogged down in federal red tape and a protracted land dispute, angering family members and risking plans to hold a dedication ceremony on the 10th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks. The delays have prompted an advocacy group, Families of Flight 93, to ask President Bush to personally intervene during his final weeks in office and to allow the federal government to seize the land needed for the memorial and to allocate part of the money for the project.

"He signed the memorial act. He wanted something to be there and to be in place for years and years to come," said Bodley's mother, Deborah Borza, of San Diego. "We have waited so long already. I hold on to being hopeful that between now and January 20, something will happen, something will break free."
Posted by:Steve White

#5  xlnt points all.
Posted by: Thrains Mussolini3996   2008-12-28 20:21  

#4  Personally, I am pleased the process is mired in complications.
The crescent design is an abomination.
'No Memorial' is far better than one appearing like a muslim crescent from the air, regardless of hallowed ground.
A crescent memorial would be the ultimate insult to the heroes on that tragic flight.
Posted by: logi_cal   2008-12-28 20:00  

#3  it may be sacred ground but the ppl that own it still deserve too be paid for such land, and also if they are gonna put an islamic symbol in the memorial i wouldn't give it up either
Posted by: rabid whitetail   2008-12-28 17:43  

#2  Wasn't there a controversy about the nature of the memorial -- the official design featured a muslim crescent?
Posted by: regular joe   2008-12-28 12:51  

#1  First of all, this is sacred fucking ground. every bit as sacred as any Revolutionary or Civil War battleground.

Secondly, whomever offered $250,000 for 273 acres is an idiot and should be removed from the sale process entirely.
Posted by: Mike N.   2008-12-28 00:22  

00:00