You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Court won't review Obama's eligibility to serve
2008-12-08
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court has turned down an emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth.

The court did not comment on its order Monday rejecting the call by Leo Donofrio of East Brunswick, N.J., to intervene in the presidential election. Donofrio says that since Obama had dual nationality at birth -- his mother was American and his Kenyan father at the time was a British subject -- he cannot possibly be a "natural born citizen," one of the requirements the Constitution lists for eligibility to be president.

Donofrio also contends that two other candidates, Republican John McCain and Socialist Workers candidate Roger Calero, also are not natural-born citizens and thus ineligible to be president.

At least one other appeal over Obama's citizenship remains at the court. Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, Pa., argues that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii as Obama says and the Hawaii secretary of state has confirmed. Berg says Obama also may be a citizen of Indonesia, where he lived as a boy. Federal courts in Pennsylvania have dismissed Berg's lawsuit.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#7  Donofrio also contends that two other candidates, Republican John McCain and Socialist Workers candidate Roger Calero, also are not natural-born citizens and thus ineligible to be president.

Did he contend this in his suit? Or was this just a gratuitous mention in the article?
Posted by: eLarson   2008-12-08 22:13  

#6  Look at the bright side. At least the Donks don't have to commit the US to engage in Anschluss annexation of Kenya to make it part of American territory to fit the bill. That and the Atlantic will keep the uncontrolled immigration issue tied to the south.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-12-08 21:34  

#5  I'm with you Iblis. Can I disregard laws now too?
Posted by: Hellfish   2008-12-08 20:44  

#4  Iblis: HOW?
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-12-08 20:09  

#3  So, out of curiosity, is there anyone who can and will enforce the terms of the Constitution? Is there any point ever bringing it up again?
Posted by: Iblis   2008-12-08 19:26  

#2  We lost; give it a rest.
Posted by: DMFD   2008-12-08 19:22  

#1  OK you had your shot. No Sore-Loserman stuff.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-12-08 19:06  

00:00