| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| N.Y. Times whitewashes Obama-Ayers connection |
| 2008-10-05 |
| Posted by:tipper |
| #10 They're trying to innoculate Obama against the attack that Palin kicked off, hoping a little of the truth will create antibodies against the full impact. |
| Posted by: lotp 2008-10-05 19:26 |
| #9 I'm surprised the New York Times felt forced to actually run any story on the subject. This will give a few more people a reason not to vote for Candidate Obama. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2008-10-05 18:27 |
| #8 ...and "Whitewash." |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2008-10-05 18:13 |
| #7 Does this really qualify as "News" since everyone already expects this kind of story--emphasis on "Story." |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2008-10-05 18:12 |
| #6 N.Y. Times There you go, Barbara S., all better now.... But I've now implied that the A-O connection was "dirty" (needed a wash) as contrasted with "Plugs'" assertion that The Annointed One was "clean." OMG, now where do I turn to assuage my white guilt? |
| Posted by: Uncle Phester 2008-10-05 17:23 |
| #5 "whitewashes" Isn't that racist somehow? |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2008-10-05 15:17 |
| #4 as someone else was quoted on Insty: so far in the tank they're lodged in the undergravel filter |
| Posted by: Frank G 2008-10-05 14:10 |
| #3 The AP said that Sarah Palin is 'racist' for bringing up Obama's association with Ayers. Totally in the tank. |
| Posted by: DMFD 2008-10-05 14:07 |
| #2 But.... but.... but that was long ago so doesn't matter! Now lets get back to Sarah's husband's DUI.... |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2008-10-05 10:03 |
| #1 Anyone outside of the 'inner circle' bother reading the rag for anything other than its usefulness to fill blogs with the usual effective factual analysis of its lack of integrity and misconstrued data masquerading as facts? |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2008-10-05 08:47 |